[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Operational Technical Question
Tad,
It seems to me that you would have to estimate the fraction of the
effective detector volume that is irradiated. Then divide the
detector's output by that fraction.
The volume used in the calibration of the detector is the effective volume
of the chamber. Assuming that the physical volume is about the effective volume
seems reasonable as a first estimate. So the ionization measured by the
detector is divided by the volume of the detector to give roentgens. However,
in your case, only part of the detector volume is irradiate; thus, only that
volume that contributes to the ionization should be used.
I that this helps.
Jerry Falo
jer3ry@aol.com
This is my humble opinion dashed off quickly and I disavow any knowledge of it.
;-)
______________________________ Reply Separator _________________________________
Subject: Operational Technical Question
Author: <radsafe@romulus.ehs.uiuc.edu > at internet-mail
Date: 3/11/98 10:46 AM
RADSAFERs,
What type of correction factor should be applied (if any) when using
an ionization chamber who's volume is greater than the incident beam?
(Drawing shown below)
Ionization Chamber Detector dimensions (3 1/2" dia X 4" long)
VVVVV
-------
| |
_____________|_____|________
_____________|_____|________ <---Xray Beam (1/2" diameter)
| |
-- --
| |
| |
| |
| |
-----------
************************** /^\ /^\ ***********************************
Tad Blanchard /__ \ /___\ NASA-Goddard Space Flight Center
Nat'l Health Svc, Inc O Code 205.9, Greenbelt, MD 20771
Sr Health Physics Tech / \ Phone: 301-286-9157
Assistant RSO /___\ Fax: 301-286-1618
mailto:Tad.M.Blanchard.1@GSFC.NASA.gov
http://panza.gsfc.nasa.gov/205/205-2/Health/RADPROT.HTM
************************************************************************