[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: NM State lawsuit over WIPP?
- To: radsafe@romulus.ehs.uiuc.edu (IPM Return requested) (Receipt notification requested), sandyfl@earthlink.net (IPM Return requested) (Receipt notification requested)
- Subject: Re: NM State lawsuit over WIPP?
- From: Ruth Weiner <rfweine@sandia.gov>
- Date: 18 May 1998 14:43:22 -0600
- Alternate-Recipient: Allowed
- Conversion: Allowed
- Disclose-Recipients: Prohibited
- Original-Encoded-Information-Types: IA5-Text
- Priority: normal
- Return-Receipt-To: Ruth Weiner <rfweine@sandia.gov>
- X400-Content-Type: P2-1988 ( 22 )
- X400-MTS-Identifier: [/c=US/admd= /prmd=USDOE/; 0704635609D6AF42-mtaSNL]
- X400-Originator: rfweine@sandia.gov
- X400-Received: by mta mtaSNL in /c=US/admd= /prmd=USDOE/; Relayed; 18 May 1998 14:43:22 -0600
- X400-Received: by /c=US/admd= /prmd=USDOE/; Relayed; 18 May 1998 14:43:22 -0600
- X400-Recipients: non-disclosure;
We have been keeping tabs on these lawsuits, so here are some pointes:
1. The NM Attorney General has said publicly, and often, that he
intends to get an injuction to keep the WIPP from beginning to accept
TRU waste. We fully expect that he will.
2. In 1992, the NMAG filed suit charging that (a) FLPMA did not give
the BLM authority to transfer the land the WIPP sits on and in to DOE,
and (b) WIPP was in violation of RCRA Hazardous and Solid Waste
Amendments. (a) became moot when the WIPP Land Withdrawal Act of 1992
was passed by Congress, tranferring the land (although there is a
faction here that claims this particular injuction is still in
effect). The court of appeals (First Circuit) upheld DOE on (b),
ruling that the WIPP was "grandfathered." The WIPP Land Withdrawal
Act Amendments of 1995 withdrew WIPP from the requirement for a RCRA
No-Migration Variance Petition (with EPA's blessing, by the way).
3. The State of NM still regulates the use of RCRA controlled
materials at the WIPP in daily operations, and has not yet issued a
RCRA Part B permit, but they are issuing a draft. In the meantime,
WIPP can accept waste that has no chemically hazardous constituents.
The NMAG may well sue on this too, we don't know.
Clearly only my own opinion
Ruth Weiner
rfweine@sandia.gov
______________________________ Reply Separator _________________________________
Subject: NM State lawsuit over WIPP?
Author: sandyfl@earthlink.net at hubsmtp
Date: 5/18/98 2:28 PM
I heard the NM Attorney General state the other day that they would file a suit
to keep the WIPP facility from accepting any waste shipments, and to keep
this permanent. Has anyone head of such a filing at this time?
------------------
Sandy Perle
Technical Director
ICN Dosimetry Division
Costa Mesa, CA 92626
Office: (800) 548-5100 x2306
Fax: (714) 668-3111
sandyfl@earthlink.net
sperle@icnpharm.com
ICN Dosimetry Website:
http://www.dosimetry.com
Personal Homepage:
http://www.geocities.com/CapeCanaveral/1205
"The object of opening the mind, as of opening
the mouth, is to close it again on something solid"
- G. K. Chesterton -
The opinions expressed are solely, absolutely, positively, definitely those of
the author, and NOT my employer