Re: Leukemia in the news

[GACMail98@aol.com]

In a message dated 98-06-12 14:22:48 EDT, MFORD@pantex.com (MICHAEL S FORD)
writes:

<<'Thought there might be some interest in Ian's reply....  apparently,
standard "I'm no scientist" media disclaimers apply.>>

Yet another example of the objective technical commentary RADSAFERS demand
(from others).

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Date:	98-05-06 13:35:19 EDT
From:	MFORD@pantex.com (MICHAEL S FORD)

I have searched for any scintilla of technical basis or factual data in your
reply, but found it only to be an ad hominem approach.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Date:	98-05-04 11:55:41 EDT
From:	bab1303@hub.doh.wa.gov (Busby, Bruce)

Hmmm... again, you did not deny or refute it.

Anyway, if you have facts to refute [Mr. Ith's] post, give them. If all you
have is this, it made you look like you did nto know what you were talking
about. If you have facts (supported with documentation), I also would be very
interested in seeing that! 

>----------------------------------------------------<
Bruce Busby   W - bab1303@hub.doh.wa.gov  H - babusby@aol.com

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Date:	98-06-05 18:45:17 EDT
From:	bflood@SLAC.Stanford.EDU (Bob Flood)

"If you care to discuss the health and safety aspects of nuclear power or any
other activity involving radiation, this is the place. But if all you plan to
do is simply dump insinuations like the one above, I believe you are off-topic
and inappropriate."
---------
Bob Flood
bflood@slac.stanford.edu

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~``