[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Illinois had dose limits for common projections & a std. patient about 20 years ago



>References: <35B25CF2.10B9@erols.com>
>Date:         Sun, 19 Jul 1998 21:38:41 -0500
>Reply-To: Medical Physics Mailing List <MEDPHYS@LISTS.WAYNE.EDU>
>Sender: Medical Physics Listserver <medphys@cwis-20.wayne.edu>
>From: JOHN CAMERON <jrcamero@FACSTAFF.WISC.EDU>
>Subject:      Illinois had dose limits for common projections & a std. patient
>              about 20 years ago
>To: MEDPHYS@LISTS.WAYNE.EDU
>
>Dear Colleagues: Dan Garner & Sandy Perle make some good points.. I recall
>that the State of Illinois established maximum limits for some common
>projections and a "std. patient" (e.g. 23 cm thick chest) about 20 years
>ago. Larry Lanzl may know how it worked out.  I don't know if it is still
>in effect or if anyone thought it did any good.  I understand that Canada
>(or some province(s)) have a limit on the dose for mammography.  I heard
>some complaints about it a few years ago. I am not in favor of such
>clinical dose limits but it fits in with our present radiophobia.
>        I do think the NCRP should recommend that interventional
>fluoroscopic units should have an EAP- or DAP-meter as standard equipment..
>An appropriate instrument (the Diamentor) has been around for about 35
>years and is still little used (or known) in the US. Both the UK and
>Germany require such a meter on ALL fluoroscopes.
>        NEW SUBJECT: PHYSICS TRAINING OF DIAGNOSTIC RADIOLOGISTS.
>A new revision of  AAPM Report No. 11  "A GUIDE TO THE TEACING OF CLINCIAL
>RADIOLOGICAL PHYSICS TO RESIDENTS IN DIAGNOTIC AND THERAPEUTIC RADIOLOGY"
>is currently being reviewed by the AAPM Education Council.  The syllabus
>still does not contain an item that residents should be taught how to
>answer patient questions about dose in an understandable way.  I brought
>this matter to the attention of the Committee that revised the draft last
>fall.  I hoped my suggestion would have been included - it wasn't. I
>obviously believe that the new revision should correct this deficency.  I
>would  suggest the BERT concept be encouraged but anything else (except the
>LNT approach) would be an improvement over nothing..
>        The revised syllabus lists 27 topics and the suggested time to be
>spent on each topic. For example, for diagnostic radiology residents, it
>suggests four hours of instruction on radiobiology.  I'm not sure they even
>need one hour of radiobiology, except possibly for passing board exams. I
>think the  residents would benefit by a one hour lecture on  how to explain
>radiation in terms of background radiation (BERT) to the patient. That hour
>would still leave plenty of time to describesome of the evidence that low
>doses (<0.2 Gy) are probably hormetic. Those interested in radiation
>hormesis and adaptive response should visit the following new web site:
>        S. M. Javad Mortazavi M. has established a web site dealing with
>Low Dose Radiation Hormesis and related topics. It is still under
>construction but well worth visiting if you are intereste in these topics.
>He is a  Medical Physicist, Ph.D Candidate in the Biology Division of Kyoto
>University of Education, Japan   Tel (81 75) 644 8266   Fax (81 75) 645
>1734  E-mail mortalav@wsml.kyokyo-u.ac.jp  Visit his Home Page on Low Dose
>Radiation  Radiation, Hormesis and Radioadaptive Response at URL:
>http://www.angelfire.com/mo/radioadaptive  Look in his section on"
>radiation phobia" for my article on explaining radiation. to patents. Or
>look for the same article at the location "advertised:" below.
>        Best wishes,. John
>I hope to see some of you at the AAPM meeting in San Antonio.
>
>
>
>
>
>John R. Cameron,   2571 Porter Rd., P.O. Box 405, Lone Rock, WI 53556-0405
> Phones: 608/583-2160;  Fax: 608/583-2269  e-mail all year:
>jrcamero@facstaff.wisc.edu
>Our winter home (September 1 - May 15): 2678 SW 14th Dr., Gainesville, FL
>32608
>phones : 352/371-9865; Fax 352/371-9866
>
>See article: "Explaining Radiation to Patients" at
>http://www.mindspring.com/~sherouse/MPFAQ/Cameron1.html.
>If you have trouble reading it, I can send it to you as part of an e-mail
>message.
>
>                    *****
>Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) for Medphys at:
>http://www.mindspring.com/~sherouse/MPFAQ/
>
>Archives of recent Medphys postings at:
>http://www.escribe.com/medicine/medphys/
>
Chris Alston
alstonc@odrge.odr.georgetown.edu
I am not here a representative of my employer.