[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
No Subject
- To: radsafe@romulus.ehs.uiuc.edu
- From: JOHN RICH <JOHN.RICH@slchicago.infonet.com>
- Date: 15 Feb 1999 16:23 GMT
- Cc: RAYMOND G CHOW <RAYMOND.G.CHOW@slchicago.infonet.com>
- Original-Encoded-Information-Types: IA5-Text
- P1-Message-ID: us*infonet*slchicago;36c8ac32349f00infonet88
- Priority: normal
- X400-Received: by /ADMD=infonet/C=us/; Relayed; 15 Feb 1999 23:22 GMT
- X400-Received: by /PRMD=ccgate/ADMD=infonet/C=us/; Relayed; 15 Feb 1999 16:23 GMT
- X400-Received: by /PRMD=slchicago/ADMD=infonet/C=us/; Relayed; 15 Feb 1999 16:23 GMT
Radsafe Group
10CFR72.106, "Controlled area of an ISFSI or MRS," has as one of the
criteria: "The lens dose equivalent shall not exceed 0.15 Sv...."
Is there a method that the NRC has accepted for calculating the dose
to the eye from a cloud of mixed beta and gamma emmitters?
I checked the RADSAFE records and found some good information, but
would like to find out if the NRC has determined that a particular set
of assumptions and methodologies is more acceptable than others.
Thanx in advance for the help.
This request has not been reviewed, approved, or even looked at by
management.
John Rich
Sargent & Lundy Engineers
john.rich@slchicago.infonet.com
************************************************************************
The RADSAFE Frequently Asked Questions list, archives and subscription
information can be accessed at http://www.ehs.uiuc.edu/~rad/radsafe.html