[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Southwest's Chairman Has Cancer - to be "irradiated out of existance"



A view of "irradiation" in today's NYT :-)

Regards, Jim
=========

http://search.nytimes.com/partners/iib/services/bin/fastweb?getdoc+iib-site+iib-site+122+0+wAAA+irradiation
Title: Southwest's Chairman Has Cancer; Succession Issue Is Raised

banner
toolbar
August 12, 1999

Southwest's Chairman Has Cancer; Succession Issue Is Raised

By REED ABELSON

QI've got a little dab of prostate cancer which will soon be irradiated out of existence."

In characteristic fashion, the chairman and chief executive of the Southwest Airlines Co., Herb Kelleher, told employees Wednesday that he was starting eight weeks of radiation treatment for prostate cancer in Houston. His condition, he wrote in a memorandum to them, was not serious, and he apologized for troubling them with this "tidbit."

The company also played down the news. In a news release, Southwest emphasized that Kelleher, 68, planned to be in the office throughout his treatment -- and even included a quip that Kelleher thought his colleagues would be disappointed to find him in the office so much, given his usual heavy travel schedule. Kelleher also held a brief news conference.

The company's stock barely budged, falling 12.5 cents Wednesday, to $16.375.

Unlike a few years ago, when companies were reluctant to talk about the health of their top executives, Southwest was quick to go public with the news about Kelleher. The subject has lost much of its stigma since Andy Grove, the chief executive of the Intel Corp., talked about his experience with prostate cancer in a Fortune magazine cover story in 1996.

"It's not unlike erectile dysfunction," said Gerald C. Meyers, the former chairman of American Motors and a business professor emeritus at the University of Michigan. Who "would talk about that six months ago?"

But while companies are much more open about what might be ailing their top executives, and are obliged to disclose anything serious, there is another sensitive issue that fewer are willing to discuss: the company's succession plan should something happen to the chief executive.

Southwest, which had come under criticism for not being more open about who might succeed Kelleher well before Wednesday's announcement, is particularly close-mouthed. A recent shareholder resolution, for example, called for Kelleher to divide his duties, given his penchant for smoking and flying, so that the company would no be longer be subject to "one-man rule," and Business Week ran a scathing commentary earlier this month about his lack of a successor.

Although Kelleher's prognosis is very good, according to his doctor's statement, the news clearly fuels concern over whether anyone at Southwest could take Kelleher's place. Kelleher and his larger-than-life personality is closely identified with the success of the company.

Kelleher co-founded the airline in 1971 and has held the titles of chairman, chief executive and president since 1981. Southwest, the nation's fourth-largest carrier, has been praised for its winning combination of low costs and high customer service, and Kelleher has managed to engender huge loyalty among the company's employees.

"He really represents a lot of the spirit of Southwest," said Steven J. Colbert, a senior analyst for Jurika & Voyles, an investment management firm in Oakland, Calif., that is a Southwest shareholder. While Colbert said the company had many good managers, he said that he would like to have a better sense of who might be in line to take over if something were to happen to Kelleher.

The company has a succession plan that has been reviewed by its board, a spokeswoman said, but the details of that plan have not been made public because identifying future leaders might be divisive.

"It is not acceptable if there is no succession plan," Meyers said. "It is understandable and desirable if the company does not lay out all its succession plans in a premature way."

Some analysts say that Southwest has sufficient management talent to replace Kelleher, even if it is unclear which of the senior executives might be among those in the race. "They know what the formula is and wouldn't have to tinker with it," said Raymond F. Neidl, an analyst for ING Barings.

Acknowledging Kelleher's outsized reputation as "a kind of a superman," Meyers agreed. "What is making that business go is not the leader, it's the business model."

But despite the light tone employed in Wednesday's disclosure, there is little doubt that investors are taking the issue of succession seriously. While Kelleher has indicated that he expects to keep running the company through the end of next year, when his current contract expires, if not much longer, every company needs to prepare for the chief executive's sudden departure as well as eventual retirement, according to Charles M. Elson, a professor at Stetson University College of Law and an expert in corporate governance.

Even Grove, who was never forced to step down at Intel as chief executive because of his illness, had very clear succession plans, he noted.




Home | Site Index | Site Search | Forums | Archives | Marketplace

Quick News | Page One Plus | International | National/N.Y. | Business | Technology | Science | Sports | Weather | Editorial | Op-Ed | Arts | Automobiles | Books | Diversions | Job Market | Real Estate | Travel

Help/Feedback | Classifieds | Services | New York Today

Copyright 1999 The New York Times Company