[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: dose rate limit



OOPS!! Yes.

At 10:05 AM 8/19/99 -0400, you wrote:
>If you are beyond the dose rate display limit of the instrument you are
>also probably beyond the design limit for adequate charge collection.
>Hence at the higher dose rates the instrument will under respond.
>
>Date: Thu, 19 Aug 1999 08:51:51 -0400
>From: Chris Alston <alstonc@odrge.odr.georgetown.edu>
>To: radsafe@romulus.ehs.uiuc.edu
>Subject: Re: N-16 and 450P
>Message-ID: <3.0.32.19990819085150.007ccd20@141.161.237.59>
>
>P.S. The top end of the 450P is 5R h^-1. I don't know if that's high enough
>for your needs. If not, you could try integrating dose for a brief
>interval, and then correcting arithmetically.
>
>Disclaimer:  the above are the personal musings of the author, and do not
>represent any past, present, or future position of NIST, the U.S. government,
>or anyone else who might think that they are in a position of authority. 
>Lester Slaback, Jr.  [Lester.Slaback@NIST.GOV] 
>NBSR Health Physics 
>Center for Neutron Research 
>NIST
>100 Bureau Dr.  STOP 3543 
>Gaithersburg, MD  20899-3543 
>301 975-5810 voice
>301 921-9847 fax
>

************************************************************************
The RADSAFE Frequently Asked Questions list, archives and subscription
information can be accessed at http://www.ehs.uiuc.edu/~rad/radsafe.html