[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

FW: Related Ci to Bq note



Title: FW: Related Ci to Bq note

I assume that technical discussions are still on topic, Melissa, and perhaps important, as there appears to be an error in the reference quoted by Ron, and pointed out by Herwig.  I think my numbers in the past email are correct, because by another method, taking the product of a fluence rate of 1E6/(4pi) / (s.m^2), energy of 1 MeV, yield of 1, and muen/rho of 0.03 cm^2/g, I arrive at 1.4E-7 Gy/h at 1 m.  So I submit that there's a two-orders-of-magnitude error in the 1.6E-5 figure if the units are to be Gy/h.

Bruce Heinmiller CHP
heinmillerb@aecl.ca

----------
From:   Heinmiller, Bruce[SMTP:heinmillerb@aecl.ca]
Reply To:       radsafe@romulus.ehs.uiuc.edu
Sent:   Thursday, September 02, 1999 8:58 AM
To:     Multiple recipients of list
Subject:        RE: Related Ci to Bq note


I'll vote rads/h, because if I substitute  A=37 000,  E=1.25,  n=2,  and
d=1,  I get 1.5, which looks a bit high but close enough to the 1.32 R/h at
1 m from a Ci of Co-60, which would be 1.16 rads/h to air.

Bruce Heinmiller CHP
heinmillerb@aecl.ca

> ----------
> From:         Ron L. Kathren[SMTP:rkathren@tricity.wsu.edu]
> Reply To:     radsafe@romulus.ehs.uiuc.edu
> Sent:         Thursday, September 02, 1999 1:02 AM
> To:   Multiple recipients of list
> Subject:      Re: Related Ci to Bq note
>
> Yes, I think so.  Can you show me where you seem to be having a problem?
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Herwig Mandl <H.Mandl@lkasbg.gv.at>
> To: Multiple recipients of list <radsafe@romulus.ehs.uiuc.edu>
> Date: Tuesday, August 31, 1999 1:32 AM
> Subject: AW: Related Ci to Bq note
>
>
> >
> >------ =_NextPart_000_01BEF39B.38E5B050
> >Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
> >Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
> >
> >Are you sure, that the formula below will give "Gray/hour" and not
> "Rad/hour"
> >Herwig from Salzburg
> >
> >----------
> >Von: Ron L. Kathren
> >Gesendet: Montag, 30. August 1999 20:50
> >An: Multiple recipients of list
> >Betreff: Re: Related Ci to Bq note
> >
> >The SI equivalent of the 6CE rule was fully discussed on p. 47 of
> "Radiation
> >Protection", Medical Physics Handbook 16 published in 1985 (!) by Adam
> >Hilger Ltd. in conjunction with the Hospital Physicists Association and
> is:
> >
> >                Gray/hour = 1.6E-5AEn/d^2
> >
> >where A is the activity in megabequerel, E the photon energy is MeV, n
> the
> >number of phtons per disintegration, and d  the distance in meters from
> the
> >point source.
> >
> >Also given in that book is an equation to convert  beta fluence rate to
> dose
> >and a discussion gamma, the exposure rate constant in terms of SI units.
> >
>