[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: How to explain that "no risk" can't be proven (EMF)

To: radsafe@romulus.ehs.uiuc.edu
Subject: Re: How to explain that "no risk" can't be proven (EMF)
From: "Fritz A. Seiler" <faseiler@nmia.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Sep 1999 08:23:32 -0600
References: <19990915051813.32109.qmail@hotmail.com>

Dear Bjoern,
I did not mean my comments as a way to explain it to anyone; I
meant it as a basis on which to explain it in more 'basic' terms.
Best regards
Fritz
--
**************************

NOTE CHANGE OF ADDRESS

***************************

Fritz A. Seiler, Ph.D.
Principal
Sigma Five Associates
P.O. Box 1709
Los Lunas, NM 87031
Tel.    505-866-5193
Fax.    505-866-5197
e-mail: faseiler@nmia.com

***************************


************************************************************************
The RADSAFE Frequently Asked Questions list, archives and subscription
information can be accessed at http://www.ehs.uiuc.edu/~rad/radsafe.html

References:
- Re: How to explain that "no risk" can't be proven (EMF)
  - From: "Bjorn Cedervall" <bcradsafers@hotmail.com>

Prev by Date: Re: dose rate from plane source
Next by Date: Re: dose rate from plane source
Prev by thread: Re: How to explain that "no risk" can't be proven (EMF)
Next by thread: Re: How to explain that "no risk" can't be proven (EMF)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread