[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
U.S. Says Y2K Could Harm Eastern European Nuke Safety
Tuesday September 28 11:12 AM ET
U.S. Says Y2K Could Harm Eastern European Nuke Safety
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Year 2000-related glitches could undercut
safety at some of the 68 Soviet-designed nuclear power plants in nine
former Soviet bloc countries, a senior U.S. Energy Department
official told Congress Tuesday.
Energy Department experts ``expect the primary safety systems to
continue to function properly to shut down the plants safely, if
needed, during a Y2K event,'' Deputy Assistant Energy Secretary Ken
Baker said in prepared testimony.
``However, there are Y2K issues with other systems important to
safety and normal plant operations that, if left uncorrected, could
compromise nuclear safety,'' he told the Senate Special Committee on
the Y2K problem.
The Y2K glitch stems from the use of two digits to represent years,
like 99 for 1999. Unless fixed, computers may read 00 as 1900 instead
of 2000. That could trip critical systems, including power grids, and
lead nuclear plants to shut down if they lose ``off-site'' backup
power.
Baker said the 1986 disaster at Ukraine's Chernobyl No. 4 reactor,
which spewed radiation over large parts of Europe, ''revealed many
flaws in the Soviet approach to nuclear power.''
``These reactors, including one that still operates at the Chernobyl
site, suffer from deficiencies in training, safety procedures, design
and equipment,'' he said.
If not corrected, these conditions pose a ``continued risk of a
reactor accident'' in Ukraine, Russia, Armenia, Kazakhstan,
Lithuania, Slovakia, Czech Republic, Hungary and Bulgaria, Baker
said.
``The current year 2000 concerns are only a portion of our continuing
concerns,'' added Baker, principal deputy assistant secretary in the
department's Office of Non-Proliferation and National Security.
VITAL NATIONAL SECURITY INTEREST
If another major nuclear accident occurred, the United States and the
international community would be forced to deal with the political,
economic and environmental destabilization, Baker said.
As a result, the U.S. government has deemed enhancing the safety of
Soviet-era nuclear reactors and improving safety infrastructure in
countries that operate them ``a vital national security interest,''
he testified.
Energy Department officials have held many meetings with their
counterparts in the former Soviet bloc and toured several power
plants to evaluate their readiness.
Even without factoring in Y2K, ``risk experts calculate that the
frequency of a core meltdown accident at a (Soviet-designed) RBMK
reactor is approximately 100 times higher than at a typical U.S.
nuclear power plant,'' Baker said.
Unlike U.S. plants, RBMK reactors, the computers of which are ``known
to suffer from both hardware and software Y2K vulnerabilities, do not
have structures to contain radiation, ''making the consequences of a
core meltdown even more severe,'' he said.
He said radiation-monitoring and security-access systems at these
plants also were known to have ``Y2K vulnerabilities'' along with
ancillary systems that calculate the state of the reactor core.
Also Y2K vulnerable were the software that calculates power
distribution in the core and the system that keeps tabs on nuclear
fuel burned, Baker said.
``There is concern that, if not fixed, these problems could result in
the simultaneous shutdown of several nuclear plants, causing
disruption of power supplies in the middle of winter, he said.
Noting that Ukrainian nuclear power plants produced 47 percent of the
nation's electricity in 1997, Baker cited the possibility that
authorities might keep plants running even if monitoring systems
crashed, ``which would then create a safety problem.''
``Host-country experts are more concerned that Y2K would cause the
nuclear power plants to shut down, which would in turn
cause the disruption of electric supplies,'' he said.
Sandy Perle
E-Mail: sandyfl@earthlink.net
Personal Website: http://www.geocities.com/capecanaveral/1205
"The object of opening the mind, as of opening
the mouth, is to close it again on something solid"
- G. K. Chesterton -
************************************************************************
The RADSAFE Frequently Asked Questions list, archives and subscription
information can be accessed at http://www.ehs.uiuc.edu/~rad/radsafe.html