[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Six nuclear Newsweek pages: THE NEXT CHERNOBYL
> >I frequently write letters to the editor
I already sent one:
"Here are my comments to the Oct. 18 article about the nuclear situation in
Soviet Union. First, cesium 137 and strontium 90 cannot explode - the 1957
catastrophy was a thermal explosion of a nuclear waste tank. Second, these
radionuclides are two of many dozens of radionuclides that have been
released into the environment of the Mayak area since the late 1940s.
The Mayak PA is not just a reprocessing plant but also includes nuclear
reactors, enrichment facilities, waste handling and other nuclear
technologies. The 1967 event was a typhon (not an explosion) blowing through
the area - releasing many more radioactive elements from the Lake Karachai
than just cesium 137. This event followed upon two years of little rainfall
which had dried out the Lake Karachai and which had been used for dumping of
large amounts of radioactive waste.
The phrase about cesium 137 being "a highly dangerous radioisotope" is a
rather irrelevant statement - the same comment could be made for the
occurrence of natural potassium 40 in our bodies. The radioactivity
situation in former Soviet Union is problematic and for some areas a serious
problem but that does not defend carelessness with its description."
Bjorn Cedervall bcradsafers@hotmail.com
______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
************************************************************************
The RADSAFE Frequently Asked Questions list, archives and subscription
information can be accessed at http://www.ehs.uiuc.edu/~rad/radsafe.html