Re: Fwd: Radiation Exposures to Tokai Workers

["Michael C. Baker" <mcbaker@lanl.gov>]

I am not at the meeting and I posted all the information I have so 
far.  The ANS meeting was to include a special session on the accident, 
with presentations by several different representatives from Japan.  I will 
see if I can get an answer for you but I don't know how often colleagues at 
the meeting are reading their email.  I'll post any additional information 
I am able to get.

Mike


At 10:13 AM 11/17/99 -0600, you wrote:

>Date: Wed, 17 Nov 1999 07:01:07 -0500
>From: "Sandy Perle" <sandyfl@earthlink.net>
>Subject: Re: Fwd: Radiation Exposures to Tokai Workers
>
>Mike,
>
>What was the basis for the estimates presented below? Is there data
>to support the new projected figures, or, is it only based on what
>one would assume the effects the workers display, to have been
>derived from?
>
>Thanks ..
>
> > >For those of you not attending the ANS meeting in Long Beach, the best
> > >estimate of radiation exposures for the three Japanese workers are as 
> follows:
> > >
> > >A:  910 rad (not 1700)
> > >B:  500 rad (not 900)
> > >C:  120 rad (not 300)
> > >
> > >These exposures make a lot more sense in terms of their current condition.

************************************************************************
The RADSAFE Frequently Asked Questions list, archives and subscription
information can be accessed at http://www.ehs.uiuc.edu/~rad/radsafe.html