[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re[2]: Ra, 25 mrem/y
Dan,
The NCRP (Report 93?) says that the annual average background dose for
a person in the U.S. is 360 mrem from all sources, with about 200 mrem
of that from radon. It's higher in Colorado due to the higher altitude
and the much higher concentration of naturally occurring uranium in
the soil of the region. When we're talking about average background
(no occupational exposure) it includes both environmental and man-made
sources. The majority is from "environmental" sources, including
cosmic, terrestrial and internal. So, if you lived where I do, and
received absolutely no occupational radiation exposure, you would
receive about 400 mrem/y. That's what I (and I believe most others)
consider to be background.
BTW, Colorado has the highest average elevation, and a high
concentration of natural uranium in the soil, so it has one of the
highest average annual background doses in the U.S., yet it has one of
the lowest cancer rates in the country. Just one more reason that I
don't personally put much faith in the LNT at low doses. (Yes, I know
that doesn't prove anything to some of you due to the problems with
"environmental studies," but how come we can't find large
"environmental studies" that *support* the LNT at low doses???)
flames welcomed; privately of course :-)
Steve
steven.rima@doegjpo.com
______________________________ Reply Separator _________________________________
Subject: Re: Ra, 25 mrem/y
Author: Dan Burnstein <npro1@ziplink.net> at Internet
Date: 12/13/99 3:42 PM
Is the background 400mR or is that enviornmental burden plus some fraction of
all
medical burden spread equally over the population as a whole with the assumption
we
are all equal?
Jim Tocci wrote:
<snip>
************************************************************************
The RADSAFE Frequently Asked Questions list, archives and subscription
information can be accessed at http://www.ehs.uiuc.edu/~rad/radsafe.html