[ RadSafe ] Is there gonna be EPA in YEAR 12005 AC

[BLHamrick at aol.com]

In a message dated 8/14/2005 4:30:56 P.M. Pacific Standard Time,  
jjcohen at prodigy.net writes:

I can't understand why you are picking on the poor EPA. I can see  there
are a lot of soreheads on radsafe who still believe that radiation  criteria
ought to  based on science and logic. Shame oh you!
The people at EPA have done a fine job with the Yucca  Mountain
standards. They are  still employed  at EPA, aren't  they?


I love what the EPA did with the Yucca Mountain standards.  Finally, a  
recognition that yes, background radiation IS relevant when assessing overall  risk.
 
Barbara