[ RadSafe ] Traveling After Nuclear Medicine Procedure Ma
Mccormick, Luke I
luke.mccormick at dhs.gov
Fri Jul 22 17:39:02 CDT 2005
The Nuc. Med ID card for travelling patients is a great idea! We are forced
to pull hundreds of passengers off of their returning Cruise ships and
planes to resolve the radiation detections. Many have no idea they had a
radioactive procedure. However lawyers got involved and now many hospitals
will not issue them because of privacy concerns.
Luke McCormick
____________________Reply Separator____________________
Subject: [ RadSafe ] Traveling After Nuclear Medicine Procedure Ma...
Author: radsafe-bounces at radlab.nl
Date: 7/22/2005 1:25 PM
Subject:
[ RadSafe ] Traveling After Nuclear Medicine Procedure May Not
Fly
---------------------------------
Traveling After Nuclear Medicine Procedure May Not Fly
http://www.medpagetoday.com/Radiology/GeneralRadiology/tb1/1403
By Michael Smith , MedPage Today Staff Writer
Reviewed by Zalman S. Agus, MD; Emeritus Professor at the
University of
Pennsylvania School of Medicine.
LONDON, July 21-The threat of terrorism has made it tougher for
patients
who have undergone radioisotope procedures to slip quietly past
radiation detectors deployed in airports and many other public
places.
A 55-year-old commercial pilot learned that the hard way, when
he was
detained for questioning at Moscow's airport two days after
having a
thallium-201 myocardial perfusion scintigram.
After "extensive interrogation," the pilot was released, only
to trip
radiation detectors again four days later while leaving Moscow,
according to a case report in the July 23 issue of The Lancet.
The case and others like it suggest "it is important to warn
patients
having had a thallium scan that they may trigger radiation
detectors for
up to 30 days," wrote Richard Underwood, M.D., and colleagues
of
London's Royal Brompton Hospital.
In fact, the authors suggested, it should be standard practice
to give
patients an information card after they've had diagnostic or
therapeutic
procedures involving radioisotopes.
The card would give:
* The date and place of the procedure.
* The radioisotope used and its half-life.
* The potential duration of radioactive emissions.
* Who to call for verification.
More than 18 million such procedures are carried out every year
and more
and more radiation detectors are in place in what the U.S.
Nuclear
Regulatory Commission calls "critical infrastructure,"
including
airports, banks, railway stations, and highway tunnels.
In 2003, the commission urged that nuclear medicine specialists
make a
point of emphasizing that patients should follow the written
instructions they get after a procedure, which usually suggest
not using
public transport within two days.
The recommendation came after a New York State police pulled
over a bus
traveling from New York to Atlantic City after it tripped a
radiation
detector in a highway tunnel leading out of the city.
It turned out that one of the passengers had received a dose of
iodine-131 earlier the same day, but had ignored her doctor's
written
suggestion to avoid public transit for at least two days.
To "avoid unnecessary concern by law enforcement authorities,"
the
commission suggested nuclear medicine specialists should
"consider"
giving patients their business card and written information
about the
procedure.
A spokesman for the commission said there's no legal
requirement to
report such events, so the commission doesn't know how common
they are.
But reports date back to at least 1986, when a letter to the
New England
Journal of Medicine noted two incidents in which Secret Service
agents
seized patients who set off radiation detectors at the White
House after
thallium stress tests.
The half-life of thallium-201 is 73 hours; the usual
intravenous dose is
80 mega Becquerel. That means, wrote Dr. Underwood, that
patients may
trigger radiation detectors for at least two weeks.
In fact, highly sensitive modern detectors -- like those issued
to
police and other security personnel -- may detect the traces of
thallium-210 for as much as a month, according to a report at
the 2004
meeting of the Radiological Society of North America.
The least durable radioisotope was fluorine-18, which lasted
about a
day; the most durable was iodine-131, which in some cases could
still
trigger detectors 95 days after it was administered.
The pilot -- who had never complained of chest pain or
shortness of
breath -- was shown to have a dilated and hypertrophied left
ventricle
with no evidence of inducible ischemia, the authors noted.
_______________________________________________
You are currently subscribed to the RadSafe mailing list
Before posting a message to RadSafe be sure to have read and
understood the RadSafe rules. These can be found at:
http://radlab.nl/radsafe/radsaferules.html
For information on how to subscribe or unsubscribe and other
settings visit: http://radlab.nl/radsafe/
.
More information about the RadSafe
mailing list