[ RadSafe ] Beta emitters and external risks
John Jacobus
crispy_bird at yahoo.com
Mon Oct 17 07:33:54 CDT 2005
Mike,
Thanks. Yes, we do use Y-90 and I-131.
Actually, you comments lead me to The "Radionuclide
and Radiation Protection Handbook 2002."
http://rpd.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/reprint/98/1/1
The external exposure from an infinte plane source of
I-131 betas at 10 cm is 0.074 mSv/hr/MBq/cm^2, which
is about 16 times the gamma dose. From P-32, the dose
rate at 10 cm is 0.14 mSv/hr/MBq/cm^2. For F-18, that
that is 0.094 mSv/hr/MBq/cm^2.
I don't want to cut the discussion short, so does
anyone else have any criteria they use, or thoughts on
this?
--- "Stabin, Michael"
<michael.g.stabin at Vanderbilt.Edu> wrote:
>
> I would certainly worry about Y-90, if your
> institution handles this.
> I-131 betas are an external hazard, though we
> usually worry more about
> the gammas and about intakes of the radioiodine.
>
>
> Mike
>
> Michael G. Stabin, PhD, CHP
> Assistant Professor of Radiology and Radiological
> Sciences
> Department of Radiology and Radiological Sciences
> Vanderbilt University
> 1161 21st Avenue South
> Nashville, TN 37232-2675
> Phone (615) 343-0068
> Fax (615) 322-3764
> Pager (615) 835-5153
> e-mail michael.g.stabin at vanderbilt.edu
> internet www.doseinfo-radar.com
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: radsafe-bounces at radlab.nl
> [mailto:radsafe-bounces at radlab.nl] On
> Behalf Of John Jacobus
> Sent: Saturday, October 15, 2005 7:59 PM
> To: daleboyce at charter.net; radsafe at radlab.nl
> Subject: Re: [ RadSafe ] Beta emitters and external
> risks
>
> Dale,
> You misunderstood what I am look for. If you had a
> drop of a beta
> emitting radionuclide on a table what betas are of
> concern if you are
> standing by the table?
> by the way, F-18 and other PET radionuclides emitt
> positron or beta+
> particles. Shielding for the annihilation photon
> radiation shields for
> the positron particles.
>
> --- radsafe-bounces at radlab.nl
> <daleboyce at charter.net>
> wrote:
> > Hi John,
> >
> > I wouldn't ignore skin dose as a radiation hazard.
> At around 9
> > rad/hr/microcurie/cm^2 high energy beta emitters
> are
> probably the biggest
> > radiation hazard normally encountered in a
> research
> environment.
> >
> > There are other beta emitters that present a
> hazard,
> and some come
> > disguised. F-18 is known for its use in PETT with
> the 511 annihilation
> > radiation, but the intermediate energy positrons
> can
> give one heck of a beta
> > burn (and have in the past) before the gamma dose
> is
> significant.
> >
> > While low energy beta emitters such as C-14 may
> present a reduced risk due
> > to air and dead layer absorption, one shouldn't
> ignore the potential rish
> > from beta emitters.
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "John Jacobus" <crispy_bird at yahoo.com>
> > To: "radsafe" <radsafe at radlab.nl>
> > Sent: Friday, October 14, 2005 4:42 PM
> > Subject: [ RadSafe ] Beta emitters and external
> risks
> >
> >
> > > Question: Would you say that beta emitters pose
> an
> > > external radiation hazard or risk? I am not
> consider
> > > skin contamination.
> > >
> > > Are there any (other) beta emitters that you
> would consider to be a
> > > significant external hazard?
> > >
> > > What is your criteria for this judgement?
> > >
> > > (Background: I would in a medical research
> facility,
> > > and we require beta shields for work involving
> large,
> > > e.g., 10 mCi/370 MBq, amounts of P-32. Are
> there other beta
> > > emitters we should worry about?)
> > >
> > > +++++++++++++++++++
> > > On Oct. 5, 1947, in the first televised White
> House address, President
> > > Truman asked Americans to refrain from eating
> meat
> on Tuesdays and poultry
> > > on Thursdays to help stockpile grain for
> starving
> people in Europe.
> > >
> > > -- John
> > > John Jacobus, MS
> > > Certified Health Physicist
> > > e-mail: crispy_bird at yahoo.com
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > __________________________________
> > > Yahoo! Mail - PC Magazine Editors' Choice 2005
> http://mail.yahoo.com
>
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > You are currently subscribed to the RadSafe
> mailing list
> > >
> > > Before posting a message to RadSafe be sure to
> have read and understood
> > > the RadSafe rules. These can be found at:
> > > http://radlab.nl/radsafe/radsaferules.html
> > >
> > > For information on how to subscribe or
> unsubscribe
> and other settings
> > > visit: http://radlab.nl/radsafe/
> > >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > You are currently subscribed to the RadSafe
> mailing
> list
> >
> > Before posting a message to RadSafe be sure to
> have
> read and understood the RadSafe rules. These can be
> found at:
> http://radlab.nl/radsafe/radsaferules.html
> >
> > For information on how to subscribe or unsubscribe
> and other settings visit: http://radlab.nl/radsafe/
>
>
> +++++++++++++++++++
> On Oct. 5, 1947, in the first televised White House
> address, President
> Truman asked Americans to refrain from eating meat
> on Tuesdays and
> poultry on Thursdays to help stockpile grain for
> starving people in
> Europe.
>
> -- John
> John Jacobus, MS
> Certified Health Physicist
> e-mail: crispy_bird at yahoo.com
>
>
>
> __________________________________
> Yahoo! Music Unlimited
> Access over 1 million songs. Try it free.
> http://music.yahoo.com/unlimited/
> _______________________________________________
> You are currently subscribed to the RadSafe mailing
> list
>
> Before posting a message to RadSafe be sure to have
> read and understood
> the RadSafe rules. These can be found at:
> http://radlab.nl/radsafe/radsaferules.html
>
> For information on how to subscribe or unsubscribe
> and other settings
> visit: http://radlab.nl/radsafe/
>
+++++++++++++++++++
On Oct. 5, 1947, in the first televised White House address, President Truman asked Americans to refrain from eating meat on Tuesdays and poultry on Thursdays to help stockpile grain for starving people in Europe.
-- John
John Jacobus, MS
Certified Health Physicist
e-mail: crispy_bird at yahoo.com
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
More information about the RadSafe
mailing list