[ RadSafe ] Re: No funding for earth penetrating nuclear weap on

[Wilson Robert H PSNS]

They already have a "Bunker Buster" using conventional explosives, and it is
not a very far reach to extend that to a nuclear explosive device.  Seems to
me just a matter of matching the yield to the intended victim or target.


-----Original Message-----
From: Hal C [mailto:hacrad at comcast.net]
Sent: Thursday, October 27, 2005 9:50 AM
To: radsafe
Subject: [ RadSafe ] Re: No funding for earth penetrating nuclear weapon


I'm not sure what fundamental laws you a referring too but from the 
newspapers I've read, the project is continuing but with high explosive 
warheads.

Hal_C


----- Original Message ----- 
From: <jjcohen at prodigy.net>
To: "Jaro" <jaro-10kbq at sympatico.ca>
Cc: "radsafe" <radsafe at radlab.nl>
Sent: Thursday, October 27, 2005 8:59 AM
Subject: Re: [ RadSafe ] News: No funding for earth penetrating nuclear 
weapon


> Jaro,
>    My opposition to the "bunker buster" weapon development has nothing to
> do with its potential effects, or its potential utility as a weapon. I
> simply doubt that it would ever work, and object to spending 
> multi-megabucks
> on a project that would require finding an exception to the fundamental 
> laws
> of physics.     Jerry
>

_______________________________________________
You are currently subscribed to the RadSafe mailing list

Before posting a message to RadSafe be sure to have read and understood the
RadSafe rules. These can be found at:
http://radlab.nl/radsafe/radsaferules.html

For information on how to subscribe or unsubscribe and other settings visit:
http://radlab.nl/radsafe/