[ RadSafe ] RE: "Science" also misrepresents the "Chernobyl Forum" report

John Jacobus crispy_bird at yahoo.com
Wed Sep 14 09:42:39 CDT 2005


I think that two important points are obvious:

1. No excess leukemias or solid cancers were observed.

2. Dose rate is not considered in calculating leukemia
or cancer risks.  

--- Marcel Schouwenburg
<M.Schouwenburg at TNW.TUDelft.NL> wrote:

> Posted on behalf of Y.C. Luan.
>
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> . . .
> years, actuall no such excess leukemai observed,
> solid cancer could not 
> predicated. Dr Ilylin, charman of the biophysics and
. . .
> radiation received in low 
> dose rate by people, the radiation would not
> increase cancer mortality, 


+++++++++++++++++++
"Every now and then a man's mind is stretched by a new idea and never shrinks back to its original proportion." -- Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr.

-- John
John Jacobus, MS
Certified Health Physicist
e-mail:  crispy_bird at yahoo.com


		
__________________________________ 
Yahoo! Mail - PC Magazine Editors' Choice 2005 
http://mail.yahoo.com



More information about the RadSafe mailing list