[ RadSafe ] RE: "Science" also misrepresents the "Chernobyl Forum" report
John Jacobus
crispy_bird at yahoo.com
Wed Sep 14 09:42:39 CDT 2005
I think that two important points are obvious:
1. No excess leukemias or solid cancers were observed.
2. Dose rate is not considered in calculating leukemia
or cancer risks.
--- Marcel Schouwenburg
<M.Schouwenburg at TNW.TUDelft.NL> wrote:
> Posted on behalf of Y.C. Luan.
>
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> . . .
> years, actuall no such excess leukemai observed,
> solid cancer could not
> predicated. Dr Ilylin, charman of the biophysics and
. . .
> radiation received in low
> dose rate by people, the radiation would not
> increase cancer mortality,
+++++++++++++++++++
"Every now and then a man's mind is stretched by a new idea and never shrinks back to its original proportion." -- Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr.
-- John
John Jacobus, MS
Certified Health Physicist
e-mail: crispy_bird at yahoo.com
__________________________________
Yahoo! Mail - PC Magazine Editors' Choice 2005
http://mail.yahoo.com
More information about the RadSafe
mailing list