[ RadSafe ] FW: [UnplugSalem] Fw: Chernobyl 20 year later
JGinniver at aol.com
JGinniver at aol.com
Tue Apr 11 18:15:31 CDT 2006
Sandy,
many thank for the link.
I don't disagree with your views. To be honest the extrapolation of
individual doses below public dose limits into large collective doses is something I
disagree with. If I had the time I would like to estimate the collective
dose from Air Travel and point out how many additional deaths are going to
result from people flying to their holiday destinations. It is equally as valid
as the estimates of deaths from exposures from other sources.
However, as the methodologies employed by the authors of this report are
based on excepted principles I think it is important that we look at their
reasoning for selecting, for example, higher releases of certain radionuclies, or
worst case dose estimates for the intakes that may have resulted from these
releases. Where we think they have been unduly pessimistic we should put
forward counter arguments that are clear, concise and easily understood. If we
are simply dismissive we risk being seen as part of a conspiracy to cover up
the consequences of the accident.
Now I have the IAEA/WHO report I hope to be able to see why they chose to
base their assessment on different values to the ones selected in the
Fairlie/Sumner report.
Warmest regards,
Julian
More information about the RadSafe
mailing list