[ RadSafe ] Re:Reasonable risk?

jjcohen at prodigy.net jjcohen at prodigy.net
Fri Apr 21 13:27:07 CDT 2006

    The obvious presumption of this question is that somehow the worker
needs to be  better protected. What's the basis for this presumption?
Jerry Cohen

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Sandy Perle" <sandyfl at earthlink.net>
To: "Sandy Perle" <sandyfl at earthlink.net>; <jjcohen at prodigy.net>; "Flanigan,
Floyd" <Floyd.Flanigan at nmcco.com>; "Michael Bohan" <mike.bohan at yale.edu>;
<radsafe at radlab.nl>; "John Jacobus" <crispy_bird at yahoo.com>
Sent: Friday, April 21, 2006 10:56 AM
Subject: Re: [ RadSafe ] Re:Reasonable risk?

> On 21 Apr 2006 at 10:20, John Jacobus wrote:
> > How do you determine how better to protect the
> > worker.  Do you go with days-lost-on-the-job or mrem?
> John,

More information about the RadSafe mailing list