AW: AW: [ RadSafe ] Cameron's refutation of "Alara Does Work"

[John Jacobus]

Rainer,
Here you go.

Have a good weekend.
-- John

--- Rainer.Facius at dlr.de wrote:

> Thank you John for your speedy reaction.
>  
> Do you have a copy of this paper or do I have to
> order it through our library?
>  
> Kind regards, Rainer
> 
> ________________________________
> 
> Von: John Jacobus [mailto:crispy_bird at yahoo.com]
> Gesendet: Fr 21.04.2006 22:18
> An: Facius, Rainer; hflong at pacbell.net;
> jjcohen at prodigy.net; mike.bohan at yale.edu;
> radsafe at radlab.nl
> Betreff: Re: AW: [ RadSafe ] Cameron's refutation of
> "Alara Does Work" 
> 
> 
> 
> Rainer,
> I would say that the Boice paper, J Radiol Prot.
> 2001
> Dec; 21(4);400-3, detailing the limitations of the
> shipyard worker study should shed doubt on Dr.
> Cameron's assertions.
> 
> --- Rainer.Facius at dlr.de wrote:
> 

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Review of NNSW study.pdf
Type: application/pdf
Size: 443403 bytes
Desc: 868810528-Review of NNSW study.pdf
URL: <http://health.phys.iit.edu/pipermail/radsafe/attachments/20060421/4d2e6a23/attachment-0001.pdf>