[ RadSafe ] Re: How Much Did You Pay The Fraud Rokke to Speak to You?

Fri Apr 28 08:08:48 CDT 2006

Roger,
When I was in the military, and the name Durakovic was
mentioned, people would roll their eyes.  I don't
think he was held in high regard then.

--- Roger Helbig <rhelbig at california.com> wrote:

> In tracking another of the anti-DU crusaders, Asaf
> Durakovic, I found the following reference which
> supercedes the reference that Rokke goes around the
> world hitting the DoD over the head with .. he is
> not even current, but he is the "expert"
> 
>
http://www.afrri.usuhs.mil/www/outreach/pdf/doa_policy_05-003.pdf
> 
> This provides very detailed procedures for medically
> treating and following up soldiers exposed to DU.
> 
> OTSG/MEDCOM Policy Memo 05-003
> 0 4 MAR 2005
> Expires 4 March 2007
> MEMORANDUM FOR Commanders, MEDCOM Major Subordinate
> Commands
> SUBJECT: Medical Management of Army Personnel
> Exposed to Depleted Uranium (DU)
> 1. References. See Annex 1 to the enclosure.
> 2. Purpose. To clarify established policy, expand
> responsibilities and procedures, and provide
> additional guidance for the medical management of
> Army personnel exposed to DU (enclosure).
> 3. Proponent. Proponency Office for Preventive
> Medicine, San Antonio, COL Robert R. Eng.
> 4. Details.
> a. This policy supersedes OTSGIMEDCOM Policy Memo
> 03-007,13 Jan 04.
> subject: Medical Management of Army Personnel
> Exposed to Depleted Uranium (DU) (reference 4, Annex
> 1).
> b. This policy directs the implementation of the 9
> Apr 04 Department of Defense
> Health Affairs memorandum and the 30 May 03
> Department of Defense Health Affairs Policy 03-012,
> for Operation Iraqi Freedom Depleted Uranium (DU)
> Medical  Managernent (references 1 and 2,
> respectively, Annex I ) , supports the 6 Feb 04
> epartment of Defense Health Affairs Policy 04-004
> for Biomonitoring Policy and  proved Bioassays for
> Depleted uranium and Lead (reference 3, Annex I),
> and
> provides further policy, responsibilities,
> procedures, and guidance for the medical
> management of patients exposed to DU.
> -
> c. All personnel with actual or potential exposures
> to DU will continue to be
> identified, assigned a potential exposure level (I,
> 11, or Ill), assessed, and treated (if
> needed). The identified personnel will then be
> monitored and tracked according to the
> responsibilities, procedures, and guidance provided
> in the enclosure.
> 
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "roger helbig" <rhelbig at california.com>
> To: "Anne Miller" <anne at nhpeaceaction.org>
> Sent: Monday, April 24, 2006 10:46 AM
> Subject: Re: How Much Did You Pay The Fraud Rokke to
> Speak to You?
> 
> 
> I have just as much right to contact the City
> Library and
> Mayor in Manchester as you have to invite Rokke to
> speak.
>  I always have viewed libraries as places where
> people
> learn, not where they are propagandized.  Rokke
> propagandizes .. he lies about his own career and he
> lies
> about DU and its effects yet comes on as if he is
> the
> "expert of experts".  He does not deserve any venue.
>  Glad
> that I raised some hell.  Maybe they will even think
> about
> letting the event go on.  
> 
> Roger
> 
> 
> On Mon, 24 Apr 2006 12:34:47 -0400
>  Anne Miller <anne at nhpeaceaction.org> wrote:
> Thank you, Roger, for sending this information along
> - I
> will talk a  look at it when I have a chance. 
> However, I
> will say that I do not  appreciate your calling the
> venues
> (I understand that you called the  librarian at the
> Manchester City Library) where Doug Rokke is due to 
> speak
> this evening - I am trying to sort this situation
> out and
> do  not appreciate your overt meddling.  In my
> estimation,
> this is not  how normal people with ethical
> standards
> behave.  I did read your  email expressing your
> concerns
> about Dr. Rokke to the crowd in  Rochester yesterday
> (in
> front of Rokke himself).  I am doing my best  to
> weight
> facts and get information to people - yours
> included.
> 
> Your calling the Manchester City Library was over
> the top -
> the  librarian has no control of the situation and I
> don't
> understand why  you would do such a thing.
> 
> Please don't contact me again.
> 
> Peace,
> Anne
> 
> 
> On Apr 23, 2006, at 11:55 PM, Roger Helbig wrote:
> 
> > Here is a memo about Reserve First Lieutenant
> Rokke's
> "greenness"  
> > when he reported to Saudi Arabia .. you can easily
> see
> from this  
> > that he did NOT lead anything after the Gulf War
> .. he
> was very low  
> > level and just there/
> >
> > Two other attachments (one from Daniel Fahey) that
> I
> meant to  
> > attach to previous reply.
> >
> > My basic advice to you is that adding DU to your
> anti-Bush/anti- 
> > Iraq occupation mix is adding a lot of lies to
> what
> otherwise are  
> > sound rationales .. did you see 60 Minutes tonight
> .. it
> came down  
> > real heavy on the Uranium from Niger ..it should
> trigger
> all sorts  
> > of things .. I hope one of them is a return of
> Democrats
> to power  
> > in House and Senate and an impeachment charge.  I
> am one
> of those  
> > who says / When Clinton lied, no one died.  Bob
> Cherry
> even did not  
> > support the invasion of Iraq, which is surprising
> since
> he is a  
> > retired Army Colonel, but also a highly educated
> one.
> > <20060320 - Chap 11 pg 639.pdf>
> > <2006-Test-Results.pdf>
> > <COL Day Memorandum.pdf>
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> You are currently subscribed to the RadSafe mailing
> list
> 
> Before posting a message to RadSafe be sure to have
> read and understood the RadSafe rules. These can be
> found at: http://radlab.nl/radsafe/radsaferules.html
> 
> For information on how to subscribe or unsubscribe
> and other settings visit: http://radlab.nl/radsafe/
> 

+++++++++++++++++++
"A scientist's aim in a discussion with his colleagues is not to persuade, but to clarify." 
Leo Szilard
-- John
John Jacobus, MS
Certified Health Physicist
e-mail:  crispy_bird at yahoo.com

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 