[ RadSafe ] California Bills on DU ScreeningAwareness-SB1720Senate Bill - Bill Analysis

John R Johnson idias at interchange.ubc.ca
Thu Aug 17 16:17:10 CDT 2006 

Glen.

You're right, and my message is wrong. I have used these number before.

I erred in my original message. The message below has been corrected.

John

-----Original Message-----
From: Glenn R. Marshall [mailto:GRMarshall at philotechnics.com]
Sent: August 17, 2006 1:59 PM
To: John R Johnson; Flood, John; David Wesley; radsafelist
Subject: RE: [ RadSafe ] California Bills on DU
ScreeningAwareness-SB1720Senate Bill - Bill Analysis


John,

Why does DU have two numbers for U-234 (12.4 and 0.16)?

You might want to check a different source, because those numbers don't
make any sense.

Glenn Marshall, CHP

-----Original Message-----
From: John R Johnson [mailto:idias at interchange.ubc.ca] 
Sent: Thursday, August 17, 2006 4:35 PM
To: Flood, John; David Wesley; radsafelist
Subject: RE: [ RadSafe ] California Bills on DU
ScreeningAwareness-SB1720Senate Bill - Bill Analysis

John et al

The mBq/ug values in Table 1.1 of Harley et al's RAND scintific review
are
12.4 for U-238, 12.4 for U-235 and 0.60 for U-234 for U-Nat and 12.4 for
U-238, 2.26 for U-235 and 0.16 for U-234 for DU taken from NTIS
PB87-188991.

John
 _________________
John R Johnson, Ph.D.
*****
President, IDIAS, Inc
4535 West 9-Th Ave
Vancouver B. C.
V6R 2E2
(604) 222-9840
idias at interchange.ubc.ca
*****


-----Original Message-----
From: radsafe-bounces at radlab.nl [mailto:radsafe-bounces at radlab.nl]On
Behalf Of Flood, John
Sent: August 17, 2006 12:56 PM
To: David Wesley; radsafelist
Subject: RE: [ RadSafe ] California Bills on DU Screening
Awareness-SB1720Senate Bill - Bill Analysis


According to my references, natural Uranium is about 99.3% U-238, 0.7%
U-235, and 0.005% U-234.  A 4% enrichment in U-235 would be used in
power reactors.

Bob Flood
Nevada Test Site



-----Original Message-----
From: radsafe-bounces at radlab.nl [mailto:radsafe-bounces at radlab.nl] On
Behalf Of David Wesley
Sent: Thursday, August 17, 2006 12:20 PM
To: radsafelist
Subject: RE: [ RadSafe ] California Bills on DU Screening Awareness
-SB1720Senate Bill - Bill Analysis


In U-nat the breakdown of activity is as follows:

U-234:  0.0001%
U-235:  4.4561%
U-238: 95.5438%

        David Wesley, CHP
        Radiation Safety Officer
        Environmental Health and Safety
        University of California
        Riverside, CA  92521-0306

        david.wesley at ucr.edu

        951-827-5746 Direct
        951-827-5528 Admin
        951-827-5122 Fax

        http://www.ehs.ucr.edu


-----Original Message-----
From: radsafe-bounces at radlab.nl [mailto:radsafe-bounces at radlab.nl] On
Behalf Of Glenn R. Marshall
Sent: Thursday, August 17, 2006 11:18 AM
To: John R Johnson; Roger Helbig; radsafelist
Subject: RE: [ RadSafe ] California Bills on DU Screening Awareness
-SB1720Senate Bill - Bill Analysis

It's also useful for fishing, as you don't have to use those highly
toxic lead weights.

The U-235 contribution to the total radioactivity is always trivial,
regardless of enrichment.

In DU, most of the radioactivity is from U-238.  In U-nat, it's 49% each
from U-234 and U-238 (balance from U-235).  In highly enriched U, nearly
all the radioactivity is from U-234.

Glenn Marshall, CHP

-----Original Message-----
From: John R Johnson [mailto:idias at interchange.ubc.ca]
Sent: Thursday, August 17, 2006 12:35 PM
To: Roger Helbig; radsafelist
Subject: RE: [ RadSafe ] California Bills on DU Screening Awareness -
SB1720Senate Bill - Bill Analysis

Roger

Would you forward this to Chuck.

DU is useful as a counter weight, so I wouldn't call it a waste product.
The activity in DU is mainly from U-234 with a half-life of 0.45 years
and U-235 with a half-life of 0.71 billion years.

Thanks in advance

John
 _________________
John R Johnson, Ph.D.
*****
President, IDIAS, Inc
4535 West 9-Th Ave
Vancouver B. C.
V6R 2E2
(604) 222-9840
idias at interchange.ubc.ca
*****

-----Original Message-----
From: radsafe-bounces at radlab.nl [mailto:radsafe-bounces at radlab.nl]On
Behalf Of Roger Helbig
Sent: August 17, 2006 2:05 AM
To: radsafelist
Subject: [ RadSafe ] California Bills on DU Screening Awareness - SB
1720Senate Bill - Bill Analysis


Feel free to contact Chuck Nicol and make him aware of the errors in his
analysis below which has been provided to members of the California
State Assembly

Purpose  . DU is a chemically toxic, radioactive heavy metal waste
          product that has a half-life of 4.5 billion years, may cause
          genetic mutations, damage the kidneys and lungs, and may be
          cancerous when inhaled or ingested. Exposure to DU has been
          identified as a possible cause of Gulf War syndrome/illness.
          While the scientific understanding of DU's effect on health is
          still evolving, there appears to be ample evidence that there
          are some health risks associated with DU being embedded in the
          body.  As a result, this bill seeks to ensure that California
          veterans are notified of the availability of federally
screening
          for DU exposure.

           Analysis Prepared by  :    Chuck Nicol / APPR. / (916)
319-2081



http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/pub/bill/sen/sb_1701-1750/sb_1720_cfa_20060815
_163
344_asm_comm.html

_______________________________________________
You are currently subscribed to the RadSafe mailing list

Before posting a message to RadSafe be sure to have read and understood
the RadSafe rules. These can be found at:
http://radlab.nl/radsafe/radsaferules.html

For information on how to subscribe or unsubscribe and other settings
visit: http://radlab.nl/radsafe/

_______________________________________________
You are currently subscribed to the RadSafe mailing list

Before posting a message to RadSafe be sure to have read and understood
the RadSafe rules. These can be found at:
http://radlab.nl/radsafe/radsaferules.html

For information on how to subscribe or unsubscribe and other settings
visit: http://radlab.nl/radsafe/
_______________________________________________
You are currently subscribed to the RadSafe mailing list

Before posting a message to RadSafe be sure to have read and understood
the RadSafe rules. These can be found at:
http://radlab.nl/radsafe/radsaferules.html

For information on how to subscribe or unsubscribe and other settings
visit: http://radlab.nl/radsafe/


_______________________________________________
You are currently subscribed to the RadSafe mailing list

Before posting a message to RadSafe be sure to have read and understood
the
RadSafe rules. These can be found at:
http://radlab.nl/radsafe/radsaferules.html

For information on how to subscribe or unsubscribe and other settings
visit:
http://radlab.nl/radsafe/

_______________________________________________
You are currently subscribed to the RadSafe mailing list

Before posting a message to RadSafe be sure to have read and understood
the RadSafe rules. These can be found at:
http://radlab.nl/radsafe/radsaferules.html

For information on how to subscribe or unsubscribe and other settings
visit: http://radlab.nl/radsafe/

More information about the RadSafe mailing list