[ RadSafe ] Can tritium produce bremsstrahlung?

[Alan Watts]

I was able to detect 0.15 - 0.2 mR/hr with a 1" NaI on a H-3 exit sign with 
20 Ci on 12/85.

Alan

Alan Watts
RSO
Ohio University

--On Wednesday, February 22, 2006 7:40 AM -0500 "Jean-Francois, Stephane" 
<stephane_jeanfrancois at merck.com> wrote:

> Can you share the reputable sources that tells you that H-3 (in any
> amount!) can be detected by a Beta pancake ? A Geiger counter (gas chamber
> technology, this is what UI assume you are saying by "pancake") is very
> bad for detecting X-rays, less then 1 % efficiency for pancakes if my
> memory serves me well. So obviously "any amount of H-3" is a bit far
> fetch for a pancake. I would not recommend AT ALL to use a pancake for
> tritium, beta will not go through the window and Bremstrahlung will not
> be detected. Is this a clear answer ?
>
> Let's but it this way: I have a large tritium lab (37 TBq...oups, 1000 Ci)
> here and I would be VERY HAPPY if I would be able to control contamination
> with a pancake.  Please check your sources for info.
>
> This is not a stupid question, hopefully MY ANSWER is not stupid either !
>
> Regards,
>
> Stéphane Jean-François, Eng., CHP
> Manager, Environmental and Health Physics services
> Merck Frosst Canada
> 514-428-8695
> 514-428-8670
> stephane_jeanfrancois at merck.com
> www.merckfrosst.com
>
>
> -----Message d'origine-----
> De : radsafe-bounces at radlab.nl [mailto:radsafe-bounces at radlab.nl] De la
> part de JGinniver at aol.com
> Envoyé : Tuesday, February 21, 2006 5:35 PM
> À : stiegli1 at msu.edu
> Cc : radsafe at radlab.nl
> Objet : Re: [ RadSafe ] Can tritium produce bremsstrahlung?
>
>
>
> In a message dated 21/02/2006 21:25:10 GMT Standard Time,
> stiegli1 at msu.edu   writes:
>
> Could  someone please tell me if a beta pancake is able to detect tritium
> in any  amounts?  I have heard from reputable sources that it can.
> Obviously the beta is too weak to be detected so as I understand it, the
> only way would be to detect the bremsstrahlung radiation.  Is tritium
> energetic enough to produce bremsstrahlung?  Can anyone tell me how  much
> would be needed?  I apologize if this is a stupid question but  nobody
> has totally answered the question to my  satisfaction.
>
>
>
> According to the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory "Because this
> attenuation and/or stopping process produces a bremsstrahlung radiation,
> the
>
> detection of this tritium bremsstrahlung appears to be the most direct
> and   advantageous way to monitor for STP [stable metal tritides] air
> contamination.".
> They have a short article on the development of a CAM for  the measurement
> of
> STPs at : _http://www.llnl.gov/es_and_h/hc_dept/spd/MetalTritides.html_
> (http://www.llnl.gov/es_and_h/hc_dept/spd/MetalTritides.html)
>
> However it's not clear what measurement technology they are planing to
> use   for the detector.  Most modern CAM use Passively Implanted Planar
> Silicon  (PIPS) detectors.  I would have thought that if it was possible
> to  use a pancake
> geiger to measure tritium bremsstrahlung, then things like  the 'Flat
> Ferret'
> from Overhoff would not be in production.
>
> Regards,
> Julian
> _______________________________________________
> You are currently subscribed to the RadSafe mailing list
>
> Before posting a message to RadSafe be sure to have read and understood
> the RadSafe rules. These can be found at:
> http://radlab.nl/radsafe/radsaferules.html
>
> For information on how to subscribe or unsubscribe and other settings
> visit: http://radlab.nl/radsafe/
>
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> ----- Notice:  This e-mail message, together with any attachments,
> contains information of Merck & Co., Inc. (One Merck Drive, Whitehouse
> Station, New Jersey, USA 08889), and/or its affiliates (which may be
> known outside the United States as Merck Frosst, Merck Sharp & Dohme or
> MSD and in Japan, as Banyu) that may be confidential, proprietary
> copyrighted and/or legally privileged. It is intended solely for the use
> of the individual or entity named on this message.  If you are not the
> intended recipient, and have received this message in error, please
> notify us immediately by reply e-mail and then delete it from your system.
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> ----- _______________________________________________
> You are currently subscribed to the RadSafe mailing list
>
> Before posting a message to RadSafe be sure to have read and understood
> the RadSafe rules. These can be found at:
> http://radlab.nl/radsafe/radsaferules.html
>
> For information on how to subscribe or unsubscribe and other settings
> visit: http://radlab.nl/radsafe/