[ RadSafe ] A Review of the Video "Village of Widows"

[Gary Isenhower]

Look at it this way.  If you accept the proposition that a single photon 
can induce cancer, then the lack of cancer and death in a population is 
in fact equated to no harm no foul.

On the other hand, if you (quite correctly) repudiate that proposition, 
then we can begin to have intelligent debate about why its not OK to 
make up evidence to support your position, like that korean cloning 
researcher did.

Thanks,
Gary Isenhower, M.S.
713.690.3020



The Wilsons wrote:

> It never ceases to amaze me at how glibley the lack of cancer and 
> death is equated to there being no harm and no foul committed.  Does 
> there have to be cancer or does there have to be death before an 
> adverse affect is recognized in the nuclear community?
> _______________________________________________
>