[ RadSafe ] Re: Kansas to let nuclear plant guards "shoot to kill"
NeilKeeney at aol.com
NeilKeeney at aol.com
Fri Mar 24 18:04:31 CST 2006
Mike and Stu:
I also recall seeing a ten-second sound-bite on an acoustical contraption
that had originally been patented in France - long ago. As I recall, a lab
test of the full-scale model resulted in the prompt death of one of the
technicians (organs converted to something akin to a gelatinous plasma) in the
immediate area and further development for a meaningful practical application,
other than killing lab techs, was abandoned at least publicly. It does not
surprise me at all to find that it may have been sucked 'underground' to the
weapons application arena...
Neil Keeney
_mike.bohan at yale.edu_ (mailto:mike.bohan at yale.edu) writes:
I have seen examples of acoustic weapons and for the most part they
have been impractical, but check out this underwater proposal that has
recently appeared in the current issue of Popular Science.
http://www.popsci.com/popsci/whatsnew/
abcd80b13832a010vgnvcm1000004eecbccdrcrd.html
Mike Bohan, RSO
> From: Stewart Farber <farbersa at optonline.net>
> I recall reading decades ago about the French military
> trying
> to develop a focused high intensity, low frequency sound weapon that
> would
> vibrate internal organs of an enemy soldier in range --with the goal of
> prompting incapacitating/fatal internal organ damage. Anyone ever hear
> about
> such a strange use of intense low-frequency sound energy??
More information about the RadSafe
mailing list