[ RadSafe ] Report from the Institute for Energy and Environmental Research

parthasarathy k s ksparth at yahoo.co.uk
Tue Oct 24 05:47:23 CDT 2006


Friends,

I  saw an interesting report from the Institute for Energy and Environmental Research (IEER)released on October 19, 2006.  I have coordinated review of documents. I found it virtually impossible to get agreement on matters less controversial than effects of low level radiation. Dr Makhijani managed to get dozens of people from diverse backgrounds to sign a letter addressed to the US President proposing action for Setting Radiation and Multiple Exposure Environmental Health Standards to Protect Those Most at Risk, 

The first signatory is the Americal Public Health Association. Can any one enlighten me on how one manages to get support from an organization with a membership of over 50, 000 to endorse a letter which contained many controversial points

When The US National Academy of Sciences published BIER VII report, I had some correspondence with Dr Makhijani. I appreciated his persistence in getting   BIER committee address some of the important radiation safety-related issues ( he addressed a series of letters to the committee). The response of the committee to his queries  forms an appendix in the latest BIER report. I did not get satifactory response to some of my queries from Dr makhijani. I hope to get answers from the report. I am yet to go through the report from IEER. 

I shall appreciate the comments of the readers of the report the URL of which is as follows:

http://www.ieer.org/campaign/report.pdf

The related documents are available at IEER website



----- Original Message ----
From: "Dawson, Fred Mr" <Fred.Dawson199 at mod.uk>
To: radsafe at radlab.nl; srp-uk at yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, 24 October, 2006 11:51:05 AM
Subject: [ RadSafe ] Men hooked on mobile phones may suffer a 40 per cent drop in fertility

Times reports - Men hooked on mobile phones may suffer a 40 per cent
drop in fertility

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,11069-2418475,00.html


Radiation is the likely cause, reports our correspondent from the
American Society for Reproductive Medicine


MEN who are heavy users of mobile phones have significantly lower sperm
counts than those who are not, according to research that suggests
radiation from handsets could be damaging male fertility. 
Both the quantity and quality of a man's sperm decline as his daily
mobile phone use increases, a study of 361 infertility patients in the
United States indicates. 


The greatest effects were seen among very heavy users who talked on a
mobile phone for more than four hours a day. They produced about 40 per
cent less sperm than men who never used a mobile phone at all. Smaller
falls in sperm count were also found among those who used the phones
less frequently. 
The findings, from a team led by Ashok Agarwal, of the Cleveland Clinic
in Ohio, could indicate that the electromagnetic fields generated by
mobile phone handsets are interfering with sperm production. 
Previous studies have shown that close and heavy exposure to this form
of radiation damages sperm in the laboratory, though an effect has never
been demonstrated convincingly outside this environment. 
Other researchers, however, cautioned that the study showed only an
association between mobile phone use and sperm counts, but established
no causal link. It was more likely that heavy phone use was linked to
another factor, such as stress or obesity, which was responsible for the
effect, they said. 
"The findings seem pretty robust, but I can only assume that mobile
phone use is a surrogate for something else," said Allan Pacey, senior
lecturer in andrology at the University of Sheffield. "If you are
holding it up to your head to speak a lot, it makes no sense it is
having a direct effect on your testes. 
"Maybe people who use a phone for four hours a day spend more time
sitting in cars, which could mean there's a heat issue. It could be they
are more stressed, or more sedentary and sit about eating junk food
getting fat. Those seem to be better explanations than a phone causing
the damage at such a great distance." 
Dr Agarwal, who presented the results yesterday at the American Society
for Reproductive Medicine conference in New Orleans, said that they were
worrying because of the wide extent of mobile phone use. "Almost a
billion people are using cell phones and the number is growing in many
countries at 20 to 30 per cent a year," Dr Agarwal said. 
"People use mobile phones without thinking twice what the consequences
may be. It is just like using a toothbrush but mobiles could be having a
devastating effect on fertility. It still has to be proved, but it could
have a huge impact because mobiles are so much part of our lives." 
In the study, 361 men whose sperm was being analysed before fertility
treatment were asked about their mobile phone use, and split into four
groups: those who never used a phone, those who used a phone for less
than two hours, two to four hours, and more than four hours a day. 
Median sperm counts were measured at 85.89 million per millilitre for
non-users, 69.03 million for the second group, 58.87 million for the
third and 50.30 million for the fourth. Sperm motility, or swimming
ability, also fell as phone use increased, as did other measures of
quality. 
"The main finding was that on all four parameters - sperm count,
motility, viability and morphology - there were significant differences
between the groups," Dr Agarwal said. "The greater the use of cell
phones, the greater the decrease in these four parameters. That was very
clear and very significant." 
The results are similar to a previous study by researchers at the
University of Szeged, in Hungary, which suggested a 30 per cent
reduction in sperm count among men who kept a mobile phone on standby in
their trouser pockets. The research, however, failed to control for
lifestyle. 
Such controls are important because sperm production is sensitive to a
number of factors, including obesity and heat: lorry drivers and
travelling salesmen, for example, tend to have low sperm counts because
the long hours that they spend sitting increases the temperature of
their testes. 
Dr Agarwal said that if the effect was caused by mobile phones, several
explanations were possible. Studies have shown that electromagnetic
fields can damage Leydig cells in the testes, and mobile phones are also
known to cause a heating effect on tissue that may be hazardous to
sperm. Both phenomena occur over short distances, so holding a phone to
the head while speaking should not be dangerous.



Fred Dawson

Fwp_dawson at hotmail.com

_______________________________________________
You are currently subscribed to the RadSafe mailing list

Before posting a message to RadSafe be sure to have read and understood the RadSafe rules. These can be found at: http://radlab.nl/radsafe/radsaferules.html

For information on how to subscribe or unsubscribe and other settings visit: http://radlab.nl/radsafe/






Send instant messages to your online friends http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com 


More information about the RadSafe mailing list