AW: [ RadSafe ] Re: Vitamin R : Radiation induced immune responseDETERS spread of cancer

John Jacobus crispy_bird at
Tue Sep 5 09:07:44 CDT 2006

Dr. Cohen,
I find nothing objectionable about your papers. 
However, I am not an epidemiologist and cannot comment
on the issues surrounding your data.  I believe that
this was the issue you had with others.  

Apparently, the issues were never resolved.  Is that

--- "Bernard L. Cohen" <blc+ at> wrote:

> John Jacobus wrote:
> >Rainer,
> >If you would read the papers associated with Dr.
> >Cohen's data, you would know that it is not based
> on 
> >LNT hypothesis but the data itself.
> >
>     ---My papers compare the experimental data with
> predictions from the 
> LNT theory, and show that the experimental data are
> not compatible with 
> those predictions. In the scientific method, that is
> the way theories 
> are tested. If the experimental data are not
> consistent with the 
> theory's predictions, the scientific method requires
> that the theory be 
> abandoned.
>     Can you explain what you find objectionable?
> >  
> >
> >>Bernard:
> >>
> >>Having followed quite closely the arguments about
> >>your findings I can attest that whenever a
> specific
> >>hypothesis had been offered which was accessible
> to
> >>a quantitative test (in contrast to the all to
> >>frequent hand waving !!! ) that you indeed
> performed
> >>this test with the invariant published result that
> >>the hypothesis offered could not bridge the gap
> >>between your data and the LNT postulate. 
> >>
> >>Congratulations, Rainer

May we never confuse honest dissent with disloyal subversion. 
Dwight D. Eisenhower  

-- John
John Jacobus, MS
Certified Health Physicist
e-mail:  crispy_bird at

Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 

More information about the RadSafe mailing list