[ RadSafe ] three questions

Bob Cherry bobcherry at satx.rr.com
Wed Apr 4 21:03:47 CDT 2007


That is a great response! 

James will get the answers he wants from the DU experts he believes and will
stop asking RADSAFE for answers he doesn't believe. Everyone will be happy!


-----Original Message-----
From: radsafe-bounces at radlab.nl [mailto:radsafe-bounces at radlab.nl] On Behalf
Of Steven Dapra
Sent: Wednesday, April 04, 2007 8:26 PM
To: radsafe at radlab.nl
Subject: Re: [ RadSafe ] three questions

April 4


         Why don't you ask Rokke or Moret.  (I hope that is the correct 
spelling of her name.)  They seem to fancy themselves experts on DU.  You 
already know you are not going to believe anything you're told here.

Steven Dapra
sjd at swcp.com

At 11:16 PM 4/3/07 -0700, James Salsman wrote:
>1.  Are there any Health Physics Society web pages which do not deny
>the reproductive toxicity of uranium?
>2.  Is there any peer-reviewed medical publication from the past ten
>years that does deny the reproductive toxicity of uranium?
>3.  Are there any alternative hypotheses for the birth defect
>increases in Basrah, U.S., and U.K. troops which have not been ruled
>James Salsman

You are currently subscribed to the RadSafe mailing list

Before posting a message to RadSafe be sure to have read and understood the
RadSafe rules. These can be found at:

For information on how to subscribe or unsubscribe and other settings visit:

More information about the RadSafe mailing list