[ RadSafe ] Truck Driver Charged With Lying About Radioactive Cargo
Jose Julio Rozental
joseroze at netvision.net.il
Thu Aug 30 01:39:42 CDT 2007
Your question "If the truck was an open truck, why wasn't the box properly
secured?"
This happened in Brazil, not a Molybdenum-Technetium generator, but with
Iridium source, for Industrial Radiography
A radiographer and their assistants utilizing a l00 curie Ir-192 source,
was performing field radiography at pipeline in a trench. After the
conclusion the work, long enough in that warm day, from 4;00 a.m. to 6;00
p.m., the assistants gathered the container, and all other's
accessories and survey meter, and placed them on the tailgate of the
truck. Unfortunately the camera was not kept into the locked box,
projected to store the unit safely, even in the case of a collision and
overturn. Usually, before leaving the place, the radiographer is instructed
of following procedures, as required by the national competent authority
to confirm the adequacy for transport. However, the work was longer
than the usual and the workers exhausted, as consequence they made only a
check to confirm the shielding of the source. The device was supposed
to be shielded, lamentable not safely. Unfortunate this was not the unique
abnormal factor, the workers gone out the customer's facility with the
truck tailgate open, to better ventilation.
While returning to the manufacturer's facility
they did not perceive that the container fell onto the road, and in this
way began an incident that could be very dangerous (and really there were
medical treatment). Only when they arrived to the manufacturer's plant the
radiographer notices that the container was lost, and mention the fact
to the radiation Protection Officer (RPO) to take care of the
situation. The RPO decided to go back in a very low speed to he
customer's facility, about 50 miles (80 km) away, searching with a very
sensitive radiation detector, as carefully as possible, trying to
find the container in some part of the road. However the search was
unfruitful, the situation was, therefore, out of the licensee control, in
this condition the RPO decided to communicate to Regulatory Authority (I
was responsible to take care of emergency responsible with radioactive
sources, this was before Goiania)
Meanwhile, few minutes later that the container
felt onto the road, a trucker found the unit in the roadway. Knowing
nothing about radiation, he tools the unit to the job and called some few
colleagues to examine the apparatus, trying to understand what it was.
However, notwithstanding the source had been stored in the safe position,
unlucky it wasn't connected properly and the trucker, while examining
the container, pulled the source out of the cable, onto the floor,
following he handled the source, as well as six of his colleagues, trying
to understand what it was, some minutes later the trucker replaced the
source into the camera and pushed it until the shielded position, then
he took the container at home, where he repeated the same operation to is
family. Fortunately, at that moment, the housewife was much more interested
in finishing the dinner and the trucker left he camera in a corner of the
house. Next day in the morning, before left home to work, he watched the TV,
then ...
This was reality, I did the investigation and also was responsible to
enforcement.
I prepared an scenario, with several alternativas to study different
attitudes, because, it was a realistic fact and I was invited by IAEA to
present this case in many IAEA International Training Courses, including USA
at the Argonne Training Division
Jose Julio Rozental
joseroze at netvision.net.il
Israel
----- Original Message -----
From: "Steven Dapra" <sjd at swcp.com>
To: "Clayton J Bradt" <cjb01 at health.state.ny.us>; <radsafe at radlab.nl>
Sent: Thursday, August 30, 2007 5:56 AM
Subject: Re: [ RadSafe ] Truck Driver Charged With Lying About Radioactive
Cargo
Aug. 29
This story leaves out more than it tells. What was the
radioactive material? If the box did indeed fall off the back of the
truck, why did the driver lie about it (if he did lie about it) and say
someone stole it? That makes no sense at all. How did it fall off the
back of his truck? I can scarcely believe anyone would be allowed to haul
around a box of radioactive material in an open truck where the box could
slide between the slatted sides. If the truck was an open truck, why
wasn't the box properly secured?
According to the article, the driver was driving from Madison to
Milwaukee, and the box was found in Waukesha. Waukesha is about 60 miles
from Madison. How could the driver have traveled 60 miles before the box
fell off? What does getting lost have to do with anything? How did he
discover that the box had fallen off his truck, when did he find that out,
and why didn't he summon assistance as soon as he knew it was missing?
If the truck had a closed box, what happened? Did the driver
drive off with the box sitting on the tailgate? Did he drive off with the
door open? I wouldn't call it insane, I would say it's so stupid it
defies description (at least based on the article that's my assessment of
it).
Steven Dapra
At 09:46 AM 8/29/07 -0400, Clayton J Bradt wrote:
>This is insane!
>*******************************************
>Truck Driver Charged With Lying About Radioactive Cargo
>
>Milwaukee Journal Sentinel
>
>By John Diedrich
>
>August 23, 2007
>
>GREEN BAY, WI - A Green Baay man has been charged with lying to federal
>agents after he told investigators in January that someone stole a box off
>his truck containing radioactive material bound for a Milwaukee hospital,
>according to federal records.
>
>Randall U. Kubsh, 53, is charged with two counts of lying, to the FBI and
>U.S. Department of Transportation, according to an indictment handed down
>this week. If convicted, he faces up to 10 years in prison, but it's
>unlikely he will get that much time. In January, the Milwaukee County
>sheriff's office reported that a box of radioactive material bound for a
>hospital was missing. Authorities were concerned because the material could
>cause burning or poisoning if ingested.
>
>Authorities launched a criminal investigation and began a search for the
>box between Milwaukee and Madison, where Kubsh drove, Assistant U.S.
>Attorney Mel Johnson, the prosecutor in the case, said Thursday. The box
>appeared a few days later when a Waukesha man who found it near N. 46th St.
>and W. Lisbon Ave. turned it in, Johnson said. That man is not being
>charged, he said. Kubsh later told investigators he got lost on his way to
>Aurora Sinai Medical Center because of construction, Johnson said. Kubsh
>said he knew the box had fallen off his truck but he couldn't find it when
>he went back to look for it.
>***************************************************************
>Clayton J. Bradt
_______________________________________________
You are currently subscribed to the RadSafe mailing list
Before posting a message to RadSafe be sure to have read and understood the
RadSafe rules. These can be found at:
http://radlab.nl/radsafe/radsaferules.html
For information on how to subscribe or unsubscribe and other settings visit:
http://radlab.nl/radsafe/
More information about the RadSafe
mailing list