[ RadSafe ] Salsman's uranium trioxide gas spoof

[Muckerheide, Jim (CDA)]

Good Gary, Steve,  

But you needed to change the msg subject title; to

"Salsman's uranium trioxide gas spoof."


-----Original Message-----
From: radsafe-bounces at radlab.nl on behalf of Steven Dapra
Sent: Thu 2/1/2007 8:19 PM
To: radsafe at radlab.nl
Subject: Re: [ RadSafe ] Salsman's uranium trioxide gas proof
 
Feb. 1

         Thank you, Gary, for a very apt story.

         When I was in high school I sometimes attended basketball 
games.  Usually we had a few rotund men in their thirties watching from the 
sidelines, and when something happened that they didn't like they would 
bellow, "Hey ref, get in the game!"

         Why don't you get in the game, James?  Quit badgering Professor 
Raabe about Pu gas, and 'badger' me (and perhaps all of us) with some 
citations.  You have written, "The fact remains that the number of birth 
defects in the children of combat-deployed male U.S. and U.K. 1991 Gulf War 
troops has been rising sharply, from 180% above the non-combat troops from 
the same era in 2000, to 220% in 2003."  I have requested a citation for 
this claim.  What is it?

         You also alluded to a report by a Dr. Kang in the Annals of 
Epideimology.  What is the citation to this report?  In the RADSAFE archive 
posting you linked here a day or two ago you alluded to a paper by Doyle 
and Ryan.  What is the citation to this?

         Apparently you don't know when your beaten, James, so why don't 
you get in the game?  (It's ever so much fun to participate.)

Steven Dapra
sjd at swcp.com


At 04:05 PM 2/1/07 -0600, garyi at trinityphysics.com wrote:
>Does anybody remember that scene from Monty Python where this knight won't 
>let King
>Arthur cross the bridge without a fight?  So they fight and KA chops the 
>guys limbs off one at
>a time, because he doesn't know when he's beat, until there's just a 
>blood-spurting trunk with
>a mouth on top that keeps threatening to bite at KA's kneecaps.  At that 
>point there's nothing
>left to do but leave the defunct knight behind and go on with your business.
>
>James, you are that defunct knight.

[edit]