[ RadSafe ] RE: The hot and cold of history & journalistic cr edibility

[ROGERS, Brent]

...or possibly because true conservatives never, I mean NEVER change their
minds on ANYTHING once it is set, despite the preponderance of evidence
placed before them.  The current Veep, and his continued rosy outlook on
Iraq being the number 1 example coming to mind at the moment.

Brent Rogers
Leader Commercial Radiation Safety Group
Australian Nuclear Science and Technology Organisation
PMB 1, Menai NSW 2234
T 61 2 9717 3251
F 61 2 9717 9266
M 0417 231 879
E brent.rogers at ansto.gov.au 
www.ansto.gov.au
 

-----Original Message-----
From: Syd H. Levine [mailto:syd.levine at mindspring.com] 
Sent: Friday, 9 February 2007 10:04 AM
To: Susan Gawarecki; RADSAFE; gary at pageturners.com
Subject: Re: [ RadSafe ] RE: The hot and cold of history &
journalisticcredibility

Because it is speculative alarmism?  Because conservatives seem to think 
more clearly?

For some reason, there
> is a branch of conservatism that strongly resists the scientific evidence 
> for global warming.


_______________________________________________
You are currently subscribed to the RadSafe mailing list

Before posting a message to RadSafe be sure to have read and understood the
RadSafe rules. These can be found at:
http://radlab.nl/radsafe/radsaferules.html

For information on how to subscribe or unsubscribe and other settings visit:
http://radlab.nl/radsafe/