[ RadSafe ] uranium combustion product inhalation

James Salsman jsalsman at gmail.com
Sat Feb 10 01:08:39 CST 2007


I'm sorry I just sent a null reply to a digest, and I also apologize
to Steve Dapra for claiming that a risk ratio of 1.8 or 2.2 is the
same as a 180% or 220% increase; I should have said an 80% and 120%
increase.

When we make mistakes, we apologize and try to do better in the future.

Making bullets out of depleted uranium is a monumental mistake in any
situation where friendlies or civilians can become contaminated with
uranyl. We need to apologize.

How much of the restitution should come from those responsible for the
poor decision making?

Sincerely,
James Salsman



More information about the RadSafe mailing list