AW: [ RadSafe ] Equal time - a negative view on Nuclear

[Franz Schönhofer]

Dear Ruth and RADSAFERs,

I join your questions, because I think that we are bombarded with "nuclear"
nonsense enough in everyday life. Anybody who wants to read this s**t can
find enough web sites to download it. I read a few sentences and then
deleted it, because I am bored by the continuously repeated nonsense that
such agitators distribute. 

If this person would like to forward his thoughts to RADSAFE he could
subscribe to the list (just a few keyboard strokes) and distribute it under
his own name. I have problems to understand that Sandy Perle, whom I once
esteemed as a highly reputable and remarkable collegue, has distributed this
nonsense - without making it clear from the first moment, that he had been
asked to distribute it and that he did not support those thoughts. 

Best regards,

Franz


Franz Schoenhofer, PhD
MinRat i.R.
Habicherg. 31/7
A-1160 Wien/Vienna
AUSTRIA


-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: radsafe-bounces at radlab.nl [mailto:radsafe-bounces at radlab.nl] Im Auftrag
von Ruth Sponsler
Gesendet: Dienstag, 23. Jänner 2007 04:45
An: Sandy Perle; radsafe at radlab.nl; powernet at hps1.org
Betreff: Re: [ RadSafe ] Equal time - a negative view on Nuclear 

Who is Jim Bell and why is he requesting his material
to be posted to Radsafe?

Such material is easily available on the internet, and
I'm sure that almost all the members of this list have
been heavily exposed to such opinions during their
college years and while reading newspapers etc.  

On this topic, I'd like Jim Bell and his ilk to look
at this cartoon:

http://neinuclearnotes.blogspot.com/2007/01/polar-bears-for-nuclear-energy.h
tml

Anti-nuclear activists who loudly brag that 390
Megawatts of solar energy can "save the planet" are
either numerically illiterate or, frankly, they're
just not telling the truth.  

http://www.eia.doe.gov/cneaf/solar.renewables/page/state_profile/california.
html

A lot of times, anti-nuclear activists will proclaim
their concern about global warming when, in fact,
their actions have served to block the development of
the energy source that is the largest displacer of
fossil-fuel carbon emissions.  Hydroelectric dams are
a close second....solar is pitifully small, even
compared with wind power, much less hydroelectric or
nuclear.  

Ruth



--- Sandy Perle <sandyfl at cox.net> wrote:

> On 22 Jan 2007 at 15:59, J. Marshall Reber wrote: 
> 
> > At what point below does your quote of Jim Bell
> end? 
> 
> The entire piece is Jim's posting. I don't agree
> with any of his 
> positions, but told him I would post it for him. 
> 
> Regards, 
> 
> Sandy 
> 
> Sandy Perle
> Senior Vice President, Technical Operations
> Global Dosimetry Solutions, Inc.
> 2652 McGaw Avenue
> Irvine, CA 92614 
> 
> Tel: (949) 296-2306 / (888) 437-1714  Extension 2306
> Fax:(949) 296-1144
> 
> E-Mail: sperle at dosimetry.com
> E-Mail: sandyfl at cox.net 
> 
> Global Dosimetry Website: http://www.dosimetry.com/ 
> Personal Website: http://sandy-travels.com/ 
> 
> > _______________________________________________
> You are currently subscribed to the RadSafe mailing
> list
> 
> Before posting a message to RadSafe be sure to have
> read and understood the RadSafe rules. These can be
> found at: http://radlab.nl/radsafe/radsaferules.html
> 
> For information on how to subscribe or unsubscribe
> and other settings visit: http://radlab.nl/radsafe/
> 



 
____________________________________________________________________________
________
Want to start your own business?
Learn how on Yahoo! Small Business.
http://smallbusiness.yahoo.com/r-index
_______________________________________________
You are currently subscribed to the RadSafe mailing list

Before posting a message to RadSafe be sure to have read and understood the
RadSafe rules. These can be found at:
http://radlab.nl/radsafe/radsaferules.html

For information on how to subscribe or unsubscribe and other settings visit:
http://radlab.nl/radsafe/