[ RadSafe ] Re: A likely source for a great many of the contested birth defects...

[Dimiter Popoff]

>  The fact remains that the number of birth defects in the children of
>  combat-deployed male U.S. and U.K. 1991 Gulf War troops has been
>  rising sharply, from 180% above the non-combat troops from the same
>  era in 2000, to 220% in 2003.

Combat stress effect?

Dimiter

------------------------------------------------------
Dimiter Popoff               Transgalactic Instruments

http://www.tgi-sci.com
------------------------------------------------------


>  -------Original Message-------
>  From: James Salsman <jsalsman at gmail.com>
>  Subject: [ RadSafe ] Re: A likely source for a great many of the contested	birth defects...
>  Sent: Jan 29 '07 02:05
>  
>  The fact remains that the number of birth defects in the children of
>  combat-deployed male U.S. and U.K. 1991 Gulf War troops has been
>  rising sharply, from 180% above the non-combat troops from the same
>  era in 2000, to 220% in 2003.  Nutritional deficiency-related causes
>  of birth defects affect mothers, not fathers.
>  
>  People who refuse to face the truth and solve this problem are only
>  giving the military more of the same P.R. problems that they got from
>  agent orange.  This problem won't go away by simply ignoring it, or
>  telling lies, or trying to distract with anecdotes or hand-waving.
>  
>  People who defend depleted uranium weaponry claim to be in support of
>  the military.  For all the good they are doing, they might as well be
>  bombing recruiting stations.
>  
>  Sincerely,
>  James Salsman
>  
>  On 1/28/07, Roger Helbig <rhelbig at california.com> wrote:
>  > Of course that is not true, by the way, my wife and I lost three by miscarriage; that is the ultimate birth defect, and there was no cause .. NONE .. that was found and it sure as hell was not Uranium oxide.  All of you people who chant your DU mantras are flat out politically nuts and scientifically ignorant!  All of you ignore those scientific facts which do not fit with your scheme.
>  > You have no facts, just articles that float around the net, none of which can be verified by revisiting the data.
>  >
>  > ----- Original Message -----
>  > From: "James Salsman" <jsalsman at gmail.com>
>  > To: "ROY HERREN" <royherren2005 at yahoo.com>
>  > Cc: <radsafe at radlab.nl>
>  > Sent: Sunday, January 28, 2007 8:55 AM
>  > Subject: [ RadSafe ] Re: A likely source for a great many of the contestedbirth defects. Folic acid reduces cleft lip risk
>  >
>  >
>  > Presumably the U.S. and U.K. troops whose children are suffering from
>  > sharply increasing incidences of birth defects are getting enough
>  > folate in their diet.
>  >
>  > Sincerely,
>  > James Salsman
>  >
>  > On 1/28/07, ROY HERREN <royherren2005 at yahoo.com> wrote:
>  > >
>  > > James,
>  > >
>  > >    Open your mind to the possibility of other, more likely, causes of birth
>  > > defects in a war torn country that is under embargo.  A country in which the
>  > > leader, Sadam, does not equally distribute what foods and goods do come into
>  > > the country....
>  > _______________________________________________
>  > You are currently subscribed to the RadSafe mailing list
>  >
>  > Before posting a message to RadSafe be sure to have read and understood the RadSafe rules. These can be found at: http://radlab.nl/radsafe/radsaferules.html
>  >
>  > For information on how to subscribe or unsubscribe and other settings visit: http://radlab.nl/radsafe/
>  >
>  >
>  _______________________________________________
>  You are currently subscribed to the RadSafe mailing list
>  
>  Before posting a message to RadSafe be sure to have read and understood the RadSafe rules. These can be found at: http://radlab.nl/radsafe/radsaferules.html
>  
>  For information on how to subscribe or unsubscribe and other settings visit: http://radlab.nl/radsafe/
>