[ RadSafe ] IJLR - Erickson - Range of Motion assessment at radonmine

[Jerry Cuttler]

X-rays and radon are both ionizing and they affect the whole organism.
X-ray studies are easier to do than radon studies, but similar studies with 
radon will be done eventually.

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "John Jacobus" <crispy_bird at yahoo.com>
To: "Jerry Cuttler" <jerrycuttler at rogers.com>; "Muckerheide, Jim (CDA)" 
<Jim.Muckerheide at state.ma.us>; "Patricia Lewis" <lewis at radonmine.com>; 
"Barbra Erickson" <beerickson at Exchange.FULLERTON.EDU>; "RAD-SCI-L" 
<rad-sci-l at wpi.edu>
Cc: "Scott, Bobby" <BScott at lrri.org>; "Christoph Köstinger" 
<christoph.koestinger at gmx.net>; "Ted Rockwell" <tedrock at starpower.net>; 
"Edward Calabrese" <EdwardC at SchoolPH.UMass.edu>; "Ron Mitchel" 
<mitchelr at aecl.ca>; "Myron Pollycove" <pollycove at comcast.net>; "Ludwig 
Feinendegen" <feinendegen at gmx.net>; "Peter Deetjen" 
<peter.deetjen at uibk.ac.at>; "M Vogel @MSU" <mvogel at montana.edu>; "TD Luckey" 
<tdl108 at sunflower.com>; "Robert J. Cihak" <rjcihak at comcast.net>; 
<Jodi.Strzelczyk at UCHSC.edu>; <radsafe at radlab.nl>
Sent: Monday, March 12, 2007 9:31 AM
Subject: Re: [ RadSafe ] IJLR - Erickson - Range of Motion assessment at 
radonmine


> And what does this have to do with radon?  Or radon
> mines? Or ranges of motion?
>
> --- Jerry Cuttler <jerrycuttler at rogers.com> wrote:
>
>> Here's one that used x-rays.
>> There are many more ...
>>