[ RadSafe ] DU Study; Serious Health Risks Not Found

Steven Dapra sjd at swcp.com
Tue Mar 6 20:25:56 CST 2007

March 6

         James -- why don't you answer *my* question about Han Kang's 
alleged 2.2 increased risk?  Remember?  The one he made in Gulf War 
Review.  See my e-mail to RADSAFE of Feb. 28.  Did his claim ever pass peer 
review, was it published, and if so, what is the citation?

Steven Dapra
sjd at swcp.com

At 11:35 AM 3/6/07 -0800, James Salsman wrote:
>Marshall's Lockheed-managed Sandia study is two years old, and
>Marshall himself admitted that he never considered immunological or
>reproductive toxicity:
>He didn't really answer many of my questions that I posted here on
>RADSAFE when his study first came out, either:
>  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Physbang
>James Salsman

More information about the RadSafe mailing list