[ RadSafe ] DU Study; Serious Health Risks Not Found

[Steven Dapra]

March 6

         James -- why don't you answer *my* question about Han Kang's 
alleged 2.2 increased risk?  Remember?  The one he made in Gulf War 
Review.  See my e-mail to RADSAFE of Feb. 28.  Did his claim ever pass peer 
review, was it published, and if so, what is the citation?

Steven Dapra
sjd at swcp.com


At 11:35 AM 3/6/07 -0800, James Salsman wrote:
>Maury,
>
>Marshall's Lockheed-managed Sandia study is two years old, and
>Marshall himself admitted that he never considered immunological or
>reproductive toxicity:
>
>http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk:Requests_for_mediation/Depleted_uranium_and_related_articles&diff=prev&oldid=65849277
>
>He didn't really answer many of my questions that I posted here on
>RADSAFE when his study first came out, either:
>  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Physbang
>
>Sincerely,
>James Salsman