[ RadSafe ] GM vs ion chamber for dose measurement

Sandy Perle sandyfl at cox.net
Thu Mar 22 13:09:36 CDT 2007


I am in 100% agreement with you and your comments. I assume the "employer"
has their reasons for not simply utilizing an ion chamber (you can reply



Sandy Perle 
Senior Vice President, Technical Operations 
Global Dosimetry Solutions, Inc. 
2652 McGaw Avenue
Irvine, CA 92614
Tel: (949) 296-2306 / (888) 437-1714 Extension 2306 
Tel: (949) 419-1000 Extension 2306
Fax:(949) 296-1144
Global Dosimetry Website: http://www.dosimetry.com/ 
Personal Website: http://sandy-travels.com/ 

-----Original Message-----
From: radsafe-bounces at radlab.nl [mailto:radsafe-bounces at radlab.nl] On Behalf
Of Baumbaugh, Joel SPAWAR
Sent: Thursday, March 22, 2007 10:20 AM
To: radsafe at radlab.nl
Subject: [ RadSafe ] GM vs ion chamber for dose measurement

Yes, I know this isn't Friday, but I have a philosophical question for
the group.

So, in conclusion: Am I wrong to be questioning what's going on here? Is
the use of GM's for quantitative/qualitative measurement of gamma/x-ray
dose now an accepted protocol?  

Thanks (ahead of time) for your thoughts.

Joel Baumbaugh

More information about the RadSafe mailing list