[ RadSafe ] [Nuclear News] Japan's TEPCO admits 1978 nuclear criticality
Sandy Perle
sandyfl at cox.net
Thu Mar 22 15:44:54 CDT 2007
Index:
Japan's TEPCO admits 1978 nuclear criticality
Germany can abandon nuclear power and cut CO2: Greenpeace
Vietnam wants nuclear power
Fluor Forms Nuclear Power Business
2 UK sailors killed in nuclear submarine accident
Ireland Unions call for nuclear energy debate
Rate-setters look at rules for possible nuclear plant
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Japan's TEPCO admits 1978 nuclear criticality
TOKYO, March 22 (Reuters) - Japan's largest utility, Tokyo Electric
Power Co. (TEPCO) , said on Thursday there was a "criticality"
incident at one of its nuclear power plants in 1978 that could have
lasted for up to 7-½ hours.
TEPCO's admission came a week after another Japanese utility said it
had concealed a similar incident in 1999.
There were no records of the incident at the No.3 unit at TEPCO's
Fukushima Daiichi plant in Fukushima, northern Japan.
It came to light during interviews with two former workers at the
plant, both now aged around 70, a news briefing was told by Nagao
Suzuki, general manager at TEPCO's nuclear power plant management
unit.
TEPCO said it was still investigating but was unaware of any injuries
or radiation leak as a result of the incident.
"One of them had a quite clear memory about the incident. He took it
quite seriously," Suzuki said. ADVERTISEMENT
Fuel rods fell in a reactor core and may have caused self-sustaining
nuclear fission, or criticality.
It took about 7 ½ hours to place the rods into the proper positions,
he said.
Technical data which should have recorded the incident was abandoned
after 10 years in line with regulations that governed nuclear power
plant management in the 1970s. Toshiba Corp. ., the maker of the
unit, provided some data to back up what the worker said about the
incident, Suzuki said.
It was unclear if the workers had intended to conceal the incident,
he said.
TEPCO has found five past cases of mishandling of fuel rods,
including the one at the Fukushima plant.
The other four, which did not lead to criticality, also involved
Toshiba units.
Utilities are now reporting such incidents to the government after
the Trade Ministry ordered them in November to investigate power
plant records and report the findings by the end of March, a process
the ministry said would help improve the industry's safety controls.
TEPCO's admission comes after Hokuriku Electric Power Co. said last
week it had covered up an incident in 1999 that caused criticality
that lasted for 15 minutes.
------------------
Germany can abandon nuclear power and cut CO2: Greenpeace
BERLIN (AFP) - Germany could abandon nuclear energy more quickly than
planned and still achieve a 40-percent cut in carbon dioxide
emissions, environmental group Greenpeace said on Thursday.
If all nuclear power stations were closed by 2015, instead of the
planned date of 2020, Germany could still reduce its CO2 emissions by
40 percent, according to a study prepared for Greenpeace by the
EUtech institute, based in the western German city of Aachen.
Germany has the resources and the technology available to achieve
both goals, the report said.
"There can be no more excuses, a 40-percent cut by 2020 is
achievable," said Greenpeace Germany's energy expert Andree Boehling.
Shutting down the country's nuclear plants would indirectly have a
positive effect on emissions by encouraging the energy industry to
develop new technology, Boehling said.
Germany, which currently holds the rotating presidency of the
European Union, helped broker an agreement this month under which the
27 member states will reduce greenhouse gas emissions by 20 percent
from 1990 levels over the next 13 years.
But the Greenpeace-backed report, entitled "Climate protection: Plan
B," says Germany could achieve a greater reduction by using renewable
energy to generate one fifth of its heating needs and one third of
its electricity by 2020, according to the report
"The German government's Plan A has failed," Boehling said, referring
to a slight rise in CO2 emissions in Germany since 2006.
Germany has agreed to phase out nuclear power by around 2020, but
France relies on atomic energy for around 40 percent of its needs and
has pushed for it to be classed as a renewable form of energy when
the EU deal is firmed up.
-----------------
Vietnam wants nuclear power
SINGAPORE, March 22 (UPI) -- Vietnam intends to build nuclear power
plants to diversify sources for its increasing energy demand, moving
away from traditional hydropower.
"Maybe in 15 years, we hope to have a plant in operation," said Ta
Van Huong, director general of the Vietnamese Ministry of Industry's
Department of Energy and Petroleum. "Nothing is confirmed yet."
Huong, talking at the 10th Asia Power and Energy Congress in
Singapore, said he hopes the government will approve nuclear power so
his department can begin feasibility studies, Thanhnien News reports.
Iranian PressTV reports Huong plans to build a 2,000 megawatt nuclear
plant by 2015, which will come online by 2020.
The Energy Information Administration, the data arm of the U.S.
Department of Energy, says Vietnam will increase its electricity
demand by 15 percent a year over the next three years. More than half
is supplied by hydropower.
------------------
Fluor Forms Nuclear Power Business
Fluor Forms New Unit to Focus on Engineering and Construction
Services for Nuclear Industry
IRVING, Texas (AP) -- Engineering and construction services provider
Fluor Corp. on Thursday said it has formed a new business to focus on
the nuclear power market.
Nuclear power generation has gained new favor amid government
officials' increasing concerns about global warming. Proponents
consider nuclear power an alternative to coal-fired plants, which are
blamed for contributing to air pollution.
Nationwide, U.S. utilities are pursuing plans for some 30 new
reactors.
Fluor named Ron Pitts to head its nuclear business, which will fall
under the umbrella of its power group. David Constable, president of
Fluor's power group, will lead the nuclear business development
efforts.
The new unit will be headquartered in Greenville, S.C.
President Bush advocated the use of nuclear power in his State of the
Union address earlier this year, as part of a plan to diversify the
nation's energy supply.
No new nuclear reactors have been ordered in the United States since
a 1979 accident at the Three Mile Island plant in Pennsylvania raised
public ire about nuclear power
-------------------
2 UK sailors killed in nuclear submarine accident
ANCHORAGE, Alaska (AP) -- Two British sailors were killed in an
explosion aboard a Royal Navy nuclear-powered submarine in the Arctic
Ocean, and an injured crew member was evacuated to a hospital in
Anchorage, officials said Wednesday.
The explosion occurred late Tuesday aboard the HMS Tireless, which
was submerged under an ice cap about 170 miles north of Deadhorse,
Alaska. The submarine was conducting a joint exercise with the U.S.
Navy when its air purification system malfunctioned, British defense
officials said.
According to the U.S. Navy, a self-contained oxygen generation candle
exploded. The attack submarine surfaced quickly through the ice and
its nuclear reactor was not affected, according to the British
Ministry of Defense. The Tireless does not carry nuclear missiles.
The injured sailor, whose name was not released, was transported by
the Alaska Air National Guard from Deadhorse, in northern Alaska's
Prudhoe Bay, to Kulis Air National Guard Base in Anchorage, 625 miles
away, where an ambulance took him to a local hospital.
He was then taken to Alaska Regional Hospital, where he was in stable
condition, said hospital spokeswoman Kjerstin Lastufka.
"He was initially reported to have some burns," said Kalei Brooks,
spokeswoman for the Alaska Air National Guard.
The Tireless was operating with the USS Alexandria in a joint
operation to test submarine operability and tactical development in
Arctic waters. The submarine's forward compartment was damaged in the
explosion.
The equipment that failed had a 100 percent safety record, according
to a Ministry of Defense spokesman. The piece of air-purification
equipment was fitted to the submarine as part of an update in 2001.
"I am deeply saddened at the loss of the crew members from the
Tireless," said U.S. Navy Vice Adm. Jay Donnelly, commander of the
Submarine Force. "We stand by to assist in any way we can."
Since 1986, every Arctic tactical exercise has involved both U.S.
Navy and Royal Navy submarines.
Lt. Col. Andy Price, spokesman for the Royal Navy, said the
submarine, while fully functional, will be evaluated over the next 12
hours to determine whether it will continue to be part of the joint
exercises or return to the United Kingdom. Two weeks of exercises are
scheduled to end March 30.
-----------------
Ireland Unions call for nuclear energy debate
The Irish Congress of Trade Unions has called for a national debate
on nuclear power as a way of providing enough energy for Ireland's
growing population.
Speaking at the launch of a congress policy document on sustainable
energy, General Secretary David Begg said that he was not
'cheerleading' for nuclear power.
However, he said that within five years it must be acknowledged that
some energy imported from the UK would undoubtedly be generated by
nuclear means.
AdvertisementHe accused the Government of a lack of 'joined-up
thinking' in its formulation of energy policy.
Congress has also called for the establishment of a National Energy
Agency.
It said the energy issue is too serious to be left in the hands of
politicians engaging in 'electoral gimmickry'.
---------------
Rate-setters look at rules for possible nuclear plant
Consumers could be charged before any facility is built
Measures designed to encourage the development of new nuclear plants
in the state -- created with "significant deference" to Entergy --
were postponed by a month on Wednesday so the Louisiana Public
Service Commission can consider additional protections for the
state's electric customers.
The proposed rules would turn the traditional regulatory process on
its head by allowing a utility to earn money on a nuclear plant
before it is in operation. The rules would also require the PSC to
approve of the need for a nuclear plant before it is built and again
at the beginning of each of three phases. The PSC would annually
review the construction costs and, in the case the plant is never
completed, would allow a utility to collect its costs from its
customer.
The rules were requested by Commissioner Jay Blossman last year.
Other states, including Florida, Georgia and Indiana, have adopted
similar rules to encourage the development of nuclear plants.
"I wanted Louisiana to have an aggressive rule," Blossman said
Wednesday. "We may decide in two years that we really don't think
it's a smart idea. I just hope we would have the chance."
In crafting the rule, the Louisiana Public Service Commission staff
gave "significant deference" to Entergy and its position, PSC staff
attorney Ann Hill said. Entergy is the only company that has
expressed an interest in building a nuclear plant in the state.
Entergy Nuclear, a subsidiary of Entergy Corp., has said it is
considering a new nuclear unit at its Riverbend facility in St.
Francisville. It plans to apply for a license for such a plant next
year. It also intends to apply for a license to build a new unit at
Grand Gulf, in Port Gibson, Miss.
Mike Twomey, vice president of regulatory affairs for Entergy
Louisiana, has said the company may build only one unit, and could
chose between Louisiana and Mississippi, depending on which state
offers the best environment. Louisiana needs to adopt rules that
provide the company certainty it will recover its costs for a nuclear
plant, he said.
When companies built the last generation of nuclear plants in the
1980s, many utilities were not allowed to collect all of their costs
because public service commissions found them to be imprudent. Twomey
has said that such regulations discourage development of new nuclear
plants.
The rules presented on Wednesday take positions on issues favorable
to Entergy that the staff opposed.
The commissioners seemed inclined to adopt at least one of the
staff's recommendations -- to remove language from the rule that
would make all costs involved with the construction of a nuclear
plant "presumptively valid."
"We have to make sure they are prudent," said Commissioner Foster
Campbell. "As a safety net, you have to leave it in there."
The staff also recommended the utility not be guaranteed the right to
earn money from customers before a nuclear plant is completed.
That staff recommended that earnings be granted if the utility can
demonstrate that they would be in the public interest, which a
company could do when it came before the commission for approval of
the project.
"We're not suggesting we're for or against (collection of earnings),
but it should be done in the certification process," when the
commission can look at all of the facts of a particular proposal,
said David Dismukes, a consultant to the PSC who helped draft the
rules.
Dismukes said collecting earnings can be good for the public because
they lessen the eventual rate shock of paying for a nuclear plant and
can keep the company in good financial standing.
Some commissioners agreed.
"I don't feel comfortable at all saying that they can collect this
without" proving it's necessary, Commissioner Jimmy Fields said.
Even without the guarantee, the rule goes far in changing the way
such earnings were handled in the past, Dismukes said.
In the 1970s and '80s, utilities that were constructing nuclear
plants were allowed to earn money on their work in progress only if
they could prove to the commission that they were in financial
distress, he said.
"This company is not in financial distress," Campbell said. "I don't
have a problem with looking a nuclear. My dilemma is making a
sweetheart or handsome deal with a company that is flush."
The commission postponed adopting the rules after Commissioner
Lambert C. Boissiere III asked to amend them to make sure that if
Entergy stopped construction of a nuclear plant for its own reasons,
that the company would not be able to collect its costs from
Louisiana customers.
Boissiere later said such a provision is necessary because Louisiana
is competing with Mississippi for the nuclear plant. Mississippi
could offer Entergy a better deal after construction begins in
Louisiana. In that case, Entergy shouldn't be able to move the
project and charge Louisiana customers for the unfinished plant here,
he said.
After the meeting, Twomey said he has no problems with Boissiere's
amendment or the staff's recommendation to take out the language
saying the costs would be presumptively prudent.
But, he said that not including the guarantee on earnings doesn't
provide the incentives needed to attract nuclear to the state.
"I don't think it provides the same positive message," he said.
Sandy Perle
Senior Vice President, Technical Operations
Global Dosimetry Solutions, Inc.
2652 McGaw Avenue
Irvine, CA 92614
Tel: (949) 296-2306 / (888) 437-1714 Extension 2306
Fax:(949) 296-1144
E-Mail: sperle at dosimetry.com
E-Mail: sandyfl at cox.net
Global Dosimetry Website: http://www.dosimetry.com/
Personal Website: http://sandy-travels.com/
More information about the RadSafe
mailing list