[ RadSafe ] M o n t o r i n g
AnaLog Services, Inc.
AnaLog at logwell.com
Mon Nov 12 10:00:20 CST 2007
I agree 100%.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Wes Van Pelt" <WesVanPelt at verizon.net>
To: "'Franz Schönhofer'" <franz.schoenhofer at chello.at>; "'RADSAFE'"
<radsafe at radlab.nl>
Sent: Sunday, November 11, 2007 5:21 PM
Subject: RE: [ RadSafe ] M o n t o r i n g
I too would like to see Radsafe return to a open, free and (almost)
uncensored discussion. I do not recall reading any reason given for the
recent change in Radsafe policy, only its announcement a few weeks ago.
New email address: WesVanPelt at verizon.net
Best regards, Wes
Wesley R. Van Pelt, PhD, CIH, CHP
Wesley R. Van Pelt Associates, Inc.
"Not only is the universe stranger than we imagine, it is stranger than we
can imagine," Sir Arthur Eddington.
From: radsafe-bounces at radlab.nl [mailto:radsafe-bounces at radlab.nl] On Behalf
Of Franz Schönhofer
Sent: Saturday, November 10, 2007 5:05 PM
Subject: [ RadSafe ] M o n t o r i n g
The recent - and not announced - monitoring mode of RADSAFE has caused a few
persons to protest it - surprisingly including at least one person who has
been one of the subjects for fierce controversy. This monitoring mode
results in delays of messages up to a few days. This is not acceptable for a
discussion forum - in my opinion - and what is your opinion?
Other lists have the same problem of unappropriate messages, but they easily
overcome it by asking participants to forward any violations of the list
rules. Those violators are clearly shown on the list, banned from posting to
the list for a certain number of days.
I hope that the list owner will consider this.
Franz Schoenhofer, PhD
You are currently subscribed to the RadSafe mailing list
Before posting a message to RadSafe be sure to have read and understood the
RadSafe rules. These can be found at:
For information on how to subscribe or unsubscribe and other settings visit:
More information about the RadSafe