[ RadSafe ] definition of Rad

Kai Kaletsch eic at shaw.ca
Tue Oct 9 07:37:28 CDT 2007


The Wikipedia entry has been changed to: 'The rad was first defined in 1918 
as the unit of X-ray dose delivered per hour required to kill a mouse in 
1000 hours', which agrees well with the numbers that Rainer found, but not 
so well with the 1986 edition of Dictionary of Scientific units.

The reference given in Wikipedia is still Russ S, Arch Rad and Electrotech 
23, 226, 1918 according to Jerrard and McNeil (1992). Dictionary of 
Scientific Units. Chapman and Hall.

Regards,
Kai


----- Original Message ----- 
From: <Rainer.Facius at dlr.de>
To: <Colette.Tremblay at ssp.ulaval.ca>; <eic at shaw.ca>; <radsafe at radlab.nl>
Sent: Friday, October 05, 2007 8:37 AM
Subject: AW: [ RadSafe ] definition of Rad


Thank you, Colette.



So it is yet another 'unit'.



To think of it; for me, the familiar abbreviation of the ICRU-unit is "rad".



In Kai's original post he wrote " the Wikipedia entry for 'Rad', ", which 
indeed to the very careful reader might have signalled that another 'unit' 
was addressed. :-)



Kind regards, Rainer



________________________________

Von: Colette Tremblay [mailto:Colette.Tremblay at ssp.ulaval.ca]
Gesendet: Fr 05.10.2007 15:59
An: Facius, Rainer; eic at shaw.ca; radsafe at radlab.nl
Betreff: RE: [ RadSafe ] definition of Rad



Hi Rainer,

I checked the 1986 edition of Jerrard. I quote it:

Historically the rad can be traced back to 1918. In this year Russ suggested 
that the unit of X-Ray dose should be the dose required to kill a mouse and 
that the unit should be named the rad (4)
(4) Russ S., Arch Rad and Electrotech 23:226 (1918)

What I understand is that the name proposed by Russ was later adopted but 
the magnitude of the adopted unit was much smaller than what he had in mind. 
Maybe this caveat could be added to the Wikipedia entry to remove any 
confusion?

Regards,

Colette

---
Colette Tremblay
Spécialiste en radioprotection
Service de sécurité et prévention
Université Laval

Pavillon Ernest-Lemieux, bureau 2527
2325, Rue de la Vie-Étudiante
Québec QC Canada  G1V 0B1

(418) 656-2131 poste 2893
Télécopie: (418) 656-5617

Colette.Tremblay at ssp.ulaval.ca
www.ssp.ulaval.ca/sgc/radioprotection
--

Message relatif à la confidentialité:
http://www.rec.ulaval.ca/lce/securite/confidentialite.htm


-----Message d'origine-----
De : Rainer.Facius at dlr.de [mailto:Rainer.Facius at dlr.de]
Envoyé : 5 octobre 2007 09:36
À : Colette Tremblay; eic at shaw.ca; radsafe at radlab.nl
Objet : AW: [ RadSafe ] definition of Rad

Collette:



The lethal doses for mice as quoted in the PNAS paper are given in the 'old' 
unit R (Röntgen) which for practical purposes - depending on the material - 
is nearly equivalent to the rad as defined by the ICRU in 1953 (what appears 
to be part of the rationale for this choice).



With this unit of dose it takes MANY hundreds instead of ONE rad to kill 
mice. If indeed your source (Jerrard and McNeil, 1992 ) says otherwise, it 
either speaks of yet another "unit" or it speaks nonsense.



Kind regards, Rainer


________________________________

Von: radsafe-bounces at radlab.nl im Auftrag von Colette Tremblay
Gesendet: Do 04.10.2007 21:40
An: Facius, Rainer; eic at shaw.ca; radsafe at radlab.nl
Betreff: RE: [ RadSafe ] definition of Rad



Hi:

The Wikipedia entry states:

"The rad was first defined in 1918 as the unit of X-ray dose required to 
kill a mouse.[1]"

And the reference given is:

[1] Russ S, Arch Rad and Electrotech 23, 226, 1918 according to Jerrard and 
McNeil (1992). Dictionary of Scientific Units. Chapman and Hall.

Our library has the 1986 edition of Jerrard and McNeil. I'm going to check 
it.

Colette
---
Colette Tremblay
Spécialiste en radioprotection
Service de sécurité et prévention
Université Laval

Pavillon Ernest-Lemieux, bureau 2527
2325, Rue de la Vie-Étudiante
Québec QC Canada  G1V 0B1

(418) 656-2131 poste 2893
Télécopie: (418) 656-5617

Colette.Tremblay at ssp.ulaval.ca
www.ssp.ulaval.ca/sgc/radioprotection
--

Message relatif à la confidentialité:
http://www.rec.ulaval.ca/lce/securite/confidentialite.htm

-----Message d'origine-----
De : radsafe-bounces at radlab.nl [mailto:radsafe-bounces at radlab.nl] De la part 
de Rainer.Facius at dlr.de
Envoyé : 4 octobre 2007 05:44
À : eic at shaw.ca; radsafe at radlab.nl
Objet : AW: [ RadSafe ] definition of Rad

Kai,

you may need up to thousand rads (up to 10 Gy)  of acute sparsely ionizing 
radiation to kill an adult healthy mouse.

Rainer


Morton  J I, Siegel B V, Radiation Sensitivity of New Zealand Black Mice and 
the Development of Autoimmune Disease and Neoplasia. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S 
A. 68#1(1971)124-126.


"Young New Zealand Black (NZB) mice manifested extremely high resistance to 
the lethal effects of acute exposures to ionizing radiation, with a dose 
necessary to kill 50% of the animals within 30 days, LD50(30), of 964 
roentgens (R) at 30 days of age and of 856 R for 90-day-old mice. In 
contrast, Coombs' positive 9-month-old NZB mice (with low primary immune 
response) were highly susceptible (LD50(30) = 543 R), possibly because of 
anemia-stimulated erythropoiesis leading to a depletion of stem cells."

Dr. Rainer Facius
German Aerospace Center
Institute of Aerospace Medicine
Linder Hoehe
51147 Koeln
GERMANY
Voice: +49 2203 601 3147 or 3150
FAX:   +49 2203 61970

________________________________

Von: radsafe-bounces at radlab.nl im Auftrag von Kai Kaletsch
Gesendet: Di 02.10.2007 18:10
An: radsafe at radlab.nl
Betreff: [ RadSafe ] definition of Rad



Friends,

According to the Wikipedia entry for 'Rad', it was defined from 1918 to 1953 
as the unit of X-ray dose required to kill a mouse. 1) I never heard this 
definition before and 2) This seems like a very low dose for killing 
anything.

This is somewhat before my time and I normally use SI units. Is the 
Wikipedia statement correct?

Kai

_______________________________________________
You are currently subscribed to the RadSafe mailing list

Before posting a message to RadSafe be sure to have read and understood the 
RadSafe rules. These can be found at: 
http://radlab.nl/radsafe/radsaferules.html

For information on how to subscribe or unsubscribe and other settings visit: 
http://radlab.nl/radsafe/


_______________________________________________
You are currently subscribed to the RadSafe mailing list

Before posting a message to RadSafe be sure to have read and understood the 
RadSafe rules. These can be found at: 
http://radlab.nl/radsafe/radsaferules.html

For information on how to subscribe or unsubscribe and other settings visit: 
http://radlab.nl/radsafe/
_______________________________________________
You are currently subscribed to the RadSafe mailing list

Before posting a message to RadSafe be sure to have read and understood the 
RadSafe rules. These can be found at: 
http://radlab.nl/radsafe/radsaferules.html

For information on how to subscribe or unsubscribe and other settings visit: 
http://radlab.nl/radsafe/








More information about the RadSafe mailing list