[ RadSafe ] definition of Rad
John R Johnson
idias at interchange.ubc.ca
Sat Oct 6 15:06:53 CDT 2007
Rainer et al
That is why I wish we would all use SI all the time.
John
***************
John R Johnson, PhD
CEO, IDIAS, Inc.
4535 West 9th Ave
Vancouver, B. C.
V6R 2E2, Canada
(604) 222-9840
idias at interchange.ubc.ca
----- Original Message -----
From: <Rainer.Facius at dlr.de>
To: <Colette.Tremblay at ssp.ulaval.ca>; <eic at shaw.ca>; <radsafe at radlab.nl>
Sent: Friday, October 05, 2007 7:37 AM
Subject: AW: [ RadSafe ] definition of Rad
Thank you, Colette.
So it is yet another 'unit'.
To think of it; for me, the familiar abbreviation of the ICRU-unit is "rad".
In Kai's original post he wrote " the Wikipedia entry for 'Rad', ", which
indeed to the very careful reader might have signalled that another 'unit'
was addressed. :-)
Kind regards, Rainer
________________________________
Von: Colette Tremblay [mailto:Colette.Tremblay at ssp.ulaval.ca]
Gesendet: Fr 05.10.2007 15:59
An: Facius, Rainer; eic at shaw.ca; radsafe at radlab.nl
Betreff: RE: [ RadSafe ] definition of Rad
Hi Rainer,
I checked the 1986 edition of Jerrard. I quote it:
Historically the rad can be traced back to 1918. In this year Russ suggested
that the unit of X-Ray dose should be the dose required to kill a mouse and
that the unit should be named the rad (4)
(4) Russ S., Arch Rad and Electrotech 23:226 (1918)
What I understand is that the name proposed by Russ was later adopted but
the magnitude of the adopted unit was much smaller than what he had in mind.
Maybe this caveat could be added to the Wikipedia entry to remove any
confusion?
Regards,
Colette
---
Colette Tremblay
Spécialiste en radioprotection
Service de sécurité et prévention
Université Laval
Pavillon Ernest-Lemieux, bureau 2527
2325, Rue de la Vie-Étudiante
Québec QC Canada G1V 0B1
(418) 656-2131 poste 2893
Télécopie: (418) 656-5617
Colette.Tremblay at ssp.ulaval.ca
www.ssp.ulaval.ca/sgc/radioprotection
--
Message relatif à la confidentialité:
http://www.rec.ulaval.ca/lce/securite/confidentialite.htm
-----Message d'origine-----
De : Rainer.Facius at dlr.de [mailto:Rainer.Facius at dlr.de]
Envoyé : 5 octobre 2007 09:36
À : Colette Tremblay; eic at shaw.ca; radsafe at radlab.nl
Objet : AW: [ RadSafe ] definition of Rad
Collette:
The lethal doses for mice as quoted in the PNAS paper are given in the 'old'
unit R (Röntgen) which for practical purposes - depending on the material -
is nearly equivalent to the rad as defined by the ICRU in 1953 (what appears
to be part of the rationale for this choice).
With this unit of dose it takes MANY hundreds instead of ONE rad to kill
mice. If indeed your source (Jerrard and McNeil, 1992 ) says otherwise, it
either speaks of yet another "unit" or it speaks nonsense.
Kind regards, Rainer
________________________________
Von: radsafe-bounces at radlab.nl im Auftrag von Colette Tremblay
Gesendet: Do 04.10.2007 21:40
An: Facius, Rainer; eic at shaw.ca; radsafe at radlab.nl
Betreff: RE: [ RadSafe ] definition of Rad
Hi:
The Wikipedia entry states:
"The rad was first defined in 1918 as the unit of X-ray dose required to
kill a mouse.[1]"
And the reference given is:
[1] Russ S, Arch Rad and Electrotech 23, 226, 1918 according to Jerrard and
McNeil (1992). Dictionary of Scientific Units. Chapman and Hall.
Our library has the 1986 edition of Jerrard and McNeil. I'm going to check
it.
Colette
---
Colette Tremblay
Spécialiste en radioprotection
Service de sécurité et prévention
Université Laval
Pavillon Ernest-Lemieux, bureau 2527
2325, Rue de la Vie-Étudiante
Québec QC Canada G1V 0B1
(418) 656-2131 poste 2893
Télécopie: (418) 656-5617
Colette.Tremblay at ssp.ulaval.ca
www.ssp.ulaval.ca/sgc/radioprotection
--
Message relatif à la confidentialité:
http://www.rec.ulaval.ca/lce/securite/confidentialite.htm
-----Message d'origine-----
De : radsafe-bounces at radlab.nl [mailto:radsafe-bounces at radlab.nl] De la part
de Rainer.Facius at dlr.de
Envoyé : 4 octobre 2007 05:44
À : eic at shaw.ca; radsafe at radlab.nl
Objet : AW: [ RadSafe ] definition of Rad
Kai,
you may need up to thousand rads (up to 10 Gy) of acute sparsely ionizing
radiation to kill an adult healthy mouse.
Rainer
Morton J I, Siegel B V, Radiation Sensitivity of New Zealand Black Mice and
the Development of Autoimmune Disease and Neoplasia. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S
A. 68#1(1971)124-126.
"Young New Zealand Black (NZB) mice manifested extremely high resistance to
the lethal effects of acute exposures to ionizing radiation, with a dose
necessary to kill 50% of the animals within 30 days, LD50(30), of 964
roentgens (R) at 30 days of age and of 856 R for 90-day-old mice. In
contrast, Coombs' positive 9-month-old NZB mice (with low primary immune
response) were highly susceptible (LD50(30) = 543 R), possibly because of
anemia-stimulated erythropoiesis leading to a depletion of stem cells."
Dr. Rainer Facius
German Aerospace Center
Institute of Aerospace Medicine
Linder Hoehe
51147 Koeln
GERMANY
Voice: +49 2203 601 3147 or 3150
FAX: +49 2203 61970
________________________________
Von: radsafe-bounces at radlab.nl im Auftrag von Kai Kaletsch
Gesendet: Di 02.10.2007 18:10
An: radsafe at radlab.nl
Betreff: [ RadSafe ] definition of Rad
Friends,
According to the Wikipedia entry for 'Rad', it was defined from 1918 to 1953
as the unit of X-ray dose required to kill a mouse. 1) I never heard this
definition before and 2) This seems like a very low dose for killing
anything.
This is somewhat before my time and I normally use SI units. Is the
Wikipedia statement correct?
Kai
_______________________________________________
You are currently subscribed to the RadSafe mailing list
Before posting a message to RadSafe be sure to have read and understood the
RadSafe rules. These can be found at:
http://radlab.nl/radsafe/radsaferules.html
For information on how to subscribe or unsubscribe and other settings visit:
http://radlab.nl/radsafe/
_______________________________________________
You are currently subscribed to the RadSafe mailing list
Before posting a message to RadSafe be sure to have read and understood the
RadSafe rules. These can be found at:
http://radlab.nl/radsafe/radsaferules.html
For information on how to subscribe or unsubscribe and other settings visit:
http://radlab.nl/radsafe/
_______________________________________________
You are currently subscribed to the RadSafe mailing list
Before posting a message to RadSafe be sure to have read and understood the
RadSafe rules. These can be found at:
http://radlab.nl/radsafe/radsaferules.html
For information on how to subscribe or unsubscribe and other settings visit:
http://radlab.nl/radsafe/
_______________________________________________
You are currently subscribed to the RadSafe mailing list
Before posting a message to RadSafe be sure to have read and understood the
RadSafe rules. These can be found at:
http://radlab.nl/radsafe/radsaferules.html
For information on how to subscribe or unsubscribe and other settings visit:
http://radlab.nl/radsafe/
More information about the RadSafe
mailing list