[ RadSafe ] Depleted Uranium Found In Urine 20 Years Later
Otto G. Raabe
ograabe at ucdavis.edu
Mon Oct 29 10:17:43 CDT 2007
At 10:59 PM 10/28/2007, Roger Helbig wrote:
>I rather wonder if the test proves that DU is there or that uranium
>is there -- I have asked Dr Parrish what steps he has taken to
>preclude natural uranium being reported as being DU. The "aerosol"
>comment makes it sound like Parrish was not particularly unbiased
>when he began this testing.
******************************
October 29, 2007
The sector field - inductively coupled plasma - mass spectrometry
(SF-ICP-MS) and multiple collector - inductively coupled plasma -
mass spectrometry (MC-ICP-MS) can provide incredibly accurate
measurements of all uranium isotopes in urine including U-234, U-235,
U-236, U-238. [I think that this method has also been applied to to
plutonium isotopes, and it is far more accurate and precise that
old-fashioned alpha particle energy spectra counting.]
The uranium isotope ratios can be measured in urine to an accuracy
less than 5% even when the total uranium in urine is only a few
ng/liter. So a relatively small increase of U-238/U235 above the
natural ratio of 137.88 can be readily determined.
If a statistically significant increase in U-238/U-235 is observed,
that does nothing to inform the reason for that increase or the time
of a possible intake of extra U-238. A recent tiny exposure in food
could look like a larger inhalation exposure twenty years ago.
Of course, U-238 is barely radioactive and a feeble poison. Neither
radiation exposure nor chemical toxicity pose meaningful hazards for
exposure to small amounts of U-238.
Otto
**********************************************
Prof. Otto G. Raabe, Ph.D., CHP
Center for Health & the Environment
University of California
One Shields Avenue
Davis, CA 95616
E-Mail: ograabe at ucdavis.edu
Phone: (530) 752-7754 FAX: (530) 758-6140
***********************************************
More information about the RadSafe
mailing list