[ RadSafe ] Fears promoted by anti-nuclear Greens
sjd at swcp.com
Mon Apr 14 21:12:25 CDT 2008
Try a paper by Dr. Abram Petkau published in Health Physics, March
This message was posted on RADSAFE on Jan. 14, 1998:
"I believe your question concerns Abram Petkau and the "Petkau Effect." My
impression is that Dr. Petkau was/is a reputable scientist who's work in
on membranes indicated the, under some circumstances, a particular effect
achieved with a lower dose when the dose is delivered at a lower dose
work went down to 60 mrad/hr. Dr. Petkau's work is cited in BEIR-III (but
BEIR-V). The significance for radiological risk assessment was deemed
"The "Petkau Effect" has taken on some public relations significance due to the
publication of a book with that title by Ralph Graeub, a German
activist. The second edition came out in 1994. In this work, Ralph is a
extreme than he was in his earlier (1972) work, "Gentle Killers." Still, he
contends that nuclear power is devastating the world; causing AIDS is but
of this damage -- he argues that even the soil is dying. There is no
in this book; it uses the "Petkau Effect" as hand-waving support for the
cockamamie contentions of Sternglass, Mancuso, etc.
"My response to public concerns about the "Petkau Effect" has been that it
is not a
new observation, that it has been considered by the responsible scientists
it in no way alters scientific opinion about radiation risks. Of course,
work does not approach environmental radiation levels.
"caw at nrc.gov"
You can do a Google search too (as I did). Most of the answers
are anti-nuke hyperbole.
At 02:27 PM 4/14/08 -0400, Franta, Jaroslav wrote:
>Don & Radsafers,
>Where can I find some scientific (HPS ?) discussion of "The Petkau Effect"
>claims ? ....thnx !
>From: radsafe-bounces at radlab.nl [mailto:radsafe-bounces at radlab.nl]On
>Behalf Of dckosloff at firstenergycorp.com
>Sent: March 15, 2006 12:21 PM
>To: radsafe at radlab.nl
>Subject: Re: [ RadSafe ] Fears promoted by anti-nuclear Greens
>Here is an example of how the LNT is used in a public statement by lawyers
> "While Exelon claims that there is no danger to residents from the
> spills, there is no safe threshold for radiation exposure without an
> increased risk of diseases like cancer," he said.
>I have seen many other such examples used by many different people.
>Sometimes such uses are accompanied by calculations that show that some
>tiny increase in radiation exposure will certainly cause a specific number
>of deaths. Dr. Gofman has used the LNT to calculate the number of deaths
>caused by exposure to normal background radiation. There is a book called
>"The Petkau Effect" that asserts that the LNT significantly understates the
>death and illness caused by very low exposures. The NRC has even posted a
>brief discussion on its website about such misuse of the LNT.
More information about the RadSafe