[ RadSafe ] Co-60 exposure rate
Geo>K0FF
GEOelectronics at netscape.com
Thu Aug 14 18:51:35 CDT 2008
The exposure rate constant for Co-60 is 1.37011, so, just a wild guess, but I would say 3.598960E+005 mR/H, or 359.895996163823 R/H,
or did you want it in Sv/H? = 3.15628788635672
Assumes a point source, in AIR of course, no shielding.
What did you get Chris?
George Dowell
----- Original Message -----
From: Christopher Van Den Bergen
To: Geo>K0FF
Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2008 6:14 PM
Subject: Re: [ RadSafe ] Re: uranium solubility and acute andchronicexposureson the Russia-Georgia border
Ah, but what is the gamma dose rate at 60 cm?
Chris van den Bergen
OHSE Consultant
Occupational Health and Safety
Building 11, Room S703
Monash University, Clayton, Vic 3800
Telephone: +61 3 9905 1101
Mobile: 0428 333 604
Fax: +61 3 9905 2580
From: "Geo>K0FF" <GEOelectronics at netscape.com>
To: Justin Harris <justin at suntrac.com>, Maury Siskel <maurysis at peoplepc.com>,
Cc: Radsafelist <radsafe at radlab.nl>
Date: 15/08/2008 12:35 AM
Subject: Re: [ RadSafe ] Re: uranium solubility and acute and chronicexposureson the Russia-Georgia border
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
100 Ci
or
3.700e12 Bq
George Dowell
----- Original Message -----
From: "Justin Harris" <justin at suntrac.com>
To: "Maury Siskel" <maurysis at peoplepc.com>; "James Salsman"
<BenjB4 at gmail.com>
Cc: "Radsafelist" <radsafe at radlab.nl>
Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2008 1:32 AM
Subject: RE: [ RadSafe ] Re: uranium solubility and acute and
chronicexposureson the Russia-Georgia border
I wish this list was more about radiation safety (like it used to be) and
less about peoples opinions about uranium toxicity. Go to a medical site
and dispute your claims. This is starting to become very boring. who gives
a F**ck about uranium solubility (oh about 3 people on this site). Let's
discuss acutal questions that come up in the real world of health phyics.
Can anyone give me the current activity of a Co-60 source that had an
original acitivity of 200 Ci. 5.27 years ago?
More information about the RadSafe
mailing list