[ RadSafe ] Purdue working on cell phones with radiation detection
brees at lanl.gov
Tue Feb 19 08:47:02 CST 2008
Well, not really folks.
There isn't enough volume in cell phones to offer enough detection
capability to be useful unless it's a huge (unshielded) source or you're
right on top of it.
People are either ignoring physics, OR just trying to obtain
funding... They could offer bigger cell phones, THAT would be popular!
Of course there are other people who believe they can reshape physics by
inventing new magic detector materials... and they're getting funding
too! Your tax dollars at work!
(Obviously) my own personal opinions.
At 08:33 AM 2/16/2008, Steven Dapra wrote:
> Yes --- "especially happy." These personal rad detectors will be
> causing so many false alarms . . . . How about all the alarms from
> people walking by the stacks of fertilizer at the home and garden
> store? I remember a posting here two or three years ago about all the
> rad from --- what was it --- the potassium? There won't be enough jails
> to hold all the nuclear medicine patients who get smashed around and
> dragged off as suspected dirty bomb terrorists. Federal prosecutors will
> have a heyday.
>At 06:06 PM 2/15/08 -0500, Susan Gawarecki wrote:
>>I'm sure HPs everywhere will be *overjoyed* when every person has their
>>own personal radiation detector. And local police departments will be
>>The system proposed below may well be automated. No truckload of bananas
>>will be safe. Nor would any patient who had recently undergone a medical
>>procedure involving a radioactive isotope.
>>Purdue working on cell phones with radiation detection
>You are currently subscribed to the RadSafe mailing list
>Before posting a message to RadSafe be sure to have read and understood
>the RadSafe rules. These can be found at:
>For information on how to subscribe or unsubscribe and other settings
More information about the RadSafe