[ RadSafe ] NYC Proposal to Permit Radiation Detectors

Emer, Dudley EMERDF at nv.doe.gov
Mon Jan 7 13:18:10 CST 2008

I certainly agree it's very poorly written and thought out. 

My favorite is

"§10-801  Definitions.

f.  The term "permit" shall mean the permit for possession and deployment of atmospheric biological, chemical and radiological detectors issued by the commissioner."

Is the commission issuing detectors? Is there a lawyer or English major that can help me here?

Dudley Emer
Nevada Test Site - Mercury, Nv  M/S NTS306
Tel:  (702) 295-7808 - Fax:  (702) 295-7761
Pager: 7027945824 at nv.doe.gov
From: Jim Hardeman [mailto:Jim.Hardeman at dnr.state.ga.us] 
Sent: Monday, January 07, 2008 11:05 AM
To: Clayton J Bradt; Emer, Dudley; radsafe at radlab.nl
Subject: RE: [ RadSafe ] NYC Proposal to Permit Radiation Detectors

Dudley --
I think what you're saying then is that not only is the proposed ordinance ill-advised -- it's also poorly written. I concur.
Jim Hardeman
Jim.Hardeman at dnr.state.ga.us

More information about the RadSafe mailing list