[ RadSafe ] Yucca Mountain
sjd at swcp.com
Thu Jul 3 20:23:50 CDT 2008
James, what are your academic credentials that allow you to spout
off about this?
At 11:09 PM 7/2/08 -0700, James Salsman wrote:
>Failing to approve Yucca Mountain would be really bad, but allowing
>teratogenesis in the military is worse, as is the lesser evil of
>removing any mention of teratogenesis, chromosome malformations,
>general reproductive toxicity, neurotoxicity, from reports evaluating
>the safety of a substance or practice. I.e., the propaganda saying
>only kidneys were at risk. That is really bad. Shame on everyone in
>any one of the organizations that did so allow or remove.
>How much seepage have we had in recent weather from "short-term"
>holding pools? Why can't Yucca Mountain be fast-tracked to prevent
>water table seepage? There is a clear, immediate risk that could be
More information about the RadSafe