[ RadSafe ] DU circus road map

[Steven Dapra]

June 2

         Thank you, Gary!  That was hilarious.

Steve


At 12:43 PM 6/2/08 -0500, garyi at trinityphysics.com wrote:
>Since this thread
>  - has been going on for some time (way longer than needful)
>  - is convoluted/obfuscated
>  - seems to go in circles, elipses, and figure eights,
>I thought it might be helpful to provide the following rough map showing 
>where we are on the
>DU Mobius sTrip and Traveling Circuit.
>
>
>James KNOWS that DU is a Big Problem, therefore:
>
>BEGIN LOOP
>  010 James alleges some significant DU health effect (X).
> >> YOU ARE HERE <<
>  020 Radsafe members question (X), ask for citations.
>  030 James implies that Radsafe should prove (X).
>  040 Radsafe presses for citations.
>  050 James give a link to a blog/email/newspaper quote.
>  060 Radsafe asks for peer reviewed references.
>  070 James posts a reference.
>  080 Radsafe members read reference, find no proof of (X).
>  090 James makes the transformation SET (X) = (X'), pretends to be 
> vindicated.
>  100 N(x) = N(x) +1
>  110 IF N(x) = 1/0 THEN EXIT LOOP, ELSE GOTO BEGIN LOOP
>
>-Gary Isenhower
>
>
>On 2 Jun 2008 at 8:07, James Salsman wrote:
>
> > Steve,
> >
> > Thank you for reading the J.L. Domingo review:
> >
> > > DU in the form of uranyl acetate dihydrate
> > > appears to be teratogenic, at least in certain
> > > strains of laboratory mice and rats.
> >
> > Rats?  I though you said not rats for Domingo.  Anyway, that's not the
> > only uranyl cation.  Uranyl oxide is soluble in dog lung fluid in
> > around 3-5 days.  Serum chemistry is not going to care very much at
> > all about the cation in solution, although if you have acetate ions
> > you are certainly in different shape than if you have O+ in serum too.
> >
> > Did you ever find the 1953 text?