[ RadSafe ] DU circus road map

[garyi at trinityphysics.com]

Since this thread 
 - has been going on for some time (way longer than needful)
 - is convoluted/obfuscated
 - seems to go in circles, elipses, and figure eights,
I thought it might be helpful to provide the following rough map showing where we are on the 
DU Mobius sTrip and Traveling Circuit.


James KNOWS that DU is a Big Problem, therefore: 

BEGIN LOOP
 010 James alleges some significant DU health effect (X).
>> YOU ARE HERE <<
 020 Radsafe members question (X), ask for citations.
 030 James implies that Radsafe should prove (X).
 040 Radsafe presses for citations.
 050 James give a link to a blog/email/newspaper quote.
 060 Radsafe asks for peer reviewed references.
 070 James posts a reference.
 080 Radsafe members read reference, find no proof of (X).
 090 James makes the transformation SET (X) = (X'), pretends to be vindicated.
 100 N(x) = N(x) +1
 110 IF N(x) = 1/0 THEN EXIT LOOP, ELSE GOTO BEGIN LOOP
 
-Gary Isenhower


On 2 Jun 2008 at 8:07, James Salsman wrote:

> Steve,
> 
> Thank you for reading the J.L. Domingo review:
> 
> > DU in the form of uranyl acetate dihydrate
> > appears to be teratogenic, at least in certain
> > strains of laboratory mice and rats.
> 
> Rats?  I though you said not rats for Domingo.  Anyway, that's not the
> only uranyl cation.  Uranyl oxide is soluble in dog lung fluid in
> around 3-5 days.  Serum chemistry is not going to care very much at
> all about the cation in solution, although if you have acetate ions
> you are certainly in different shape than if you have O+ in serum too.
> 
> Did you ever find the 1953 text?